Kinetic Energy Needed for Proton Acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy required to accelerate a proton to a speed very close to the speed of light (0.9999c) and understanding the implications of relativistic physics. The problem involves concepts from kinetic energy, relativistic equations, and the limitations of particle acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations related to kinetic energy and question the accuracy of the original poster's math. There are inquiries about the implications of reaching the speed of light and the nature of kinetic energy at that limit. Some participants suggest using LaTeX for clearer communication of equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on calculations and clarifying concepts related to kinetic energy and relativistic limits. There is an exploration of why kinetic energy becomes infinite as velocity approaches the speed of light, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of relativistic physics without direct teacher support, which may influence the depth of understanding and the clarity of their questions. There is a focus on ensuring accurate mathematical representation and understanding of fundamental concepts.

fatcats
Messages
34
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


a) Calculate the kinetic energy required to accelerate a single proton from a rest position to 0.9999c. The mass of a proton is 1.67*10^-27 kg.
b) Find the ratio of the kinetic energy to the energy of a proton at rest.
c) Explain why no particle accelerator will ever be able to accelerate any particle to the speed of light.

Homework Equations


a) Ek = Etotal - Erest

Ek = mc^2/sqroot 1 - v^2/c^2 - mc^2

b) Ek/Erest

The Attempt at a Solution


a) I am including the calculations I have done on my word document page to make it more legible than typing it in here. Please see the attached image.

I think my work is right, but I have cross-referenced this answer with others and the math does not seem to be right... it seems to be correct until at least the step where:

Ek = 1.50 * 10^-10 / sqroot(1.9999*10^-4) - 1.50 *10^-10

After that I am not sure, but the answer I keep getting is 9.11 * 10^-10, and other answers, deemed correct have a totally different number multiplied by 10^-8...
I have been reworking this and trying to figure out where/if my calculation is wrong and I'm stuck.

b) For this question, all I do is divide the two numbers for the ratio, correct? This question is worth three marks and it seems like they want something more than just this? Am I missing something?

c) Not sure how to word this. Here's my best attempt. This question is worth one mark.

No particle accelerator will ever be able to accelerate any particle to the speed of light because according to the denominator of the aforementioned equation, sqroot (1-v^2/c^2), the speed of light acts as a limit to velocity. If velocity were to equal the speed of light, then there would be no difference in resting and kinetic energies.

Please help me understand, I am doing this course online and don't really have a teacher who can help me out. Thanks for your time.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-03-21 at 11.02.25 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-03-21 at 11.02.25 AM.png
    8.3 KB · Views: 965
Physics news on Phys.org
In your penultimate step you have divided by 0.141... instead of 0.0141...
fatcats said:
If velocity were to equal the speed of light, then there would be no difference in resting and kinetic energies.
No - if velocity = c, then KE is infinite.
 
Oh! Is that my only mistake with calculations? Thank you so much.

Why is KE infinite with velocity = c? Wouldn't that make the denominator 1? I don't understand
 
fatcats said:
Why is KE infinite with velocity = c? Wouldn't that make the denominator 1? I don't understand
It's hard to read your equations -- consider learning to use LaTeX for your equations when posting at the PF. There is a LaTeX Primer under INFO (at the top of the page), Help/How-To.

When written out as an equation, it's easy to see how the denominator goes to zero if v = c

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Relativ/imgrel/rke2.gif
rke2.gif
 

Attachments

  • rke2.gif
    rke2.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 703
I usually upload my equations in a neat screenshot, but I will look at Latex

I don't understand why it is infinity.

(c)^2/(c)^2 = 1
1 - (c)^2/(c)^2 = 0
squareroot of 0 = 0

so how is that infinity?
 
fatcats said:
I usually upload my equations in a neat screenshot, but I will look at Latex

I don't understand why it is infinity.

(c)^2/(c)^2 = 1
1 - (c)^2/(c)^2 = 0
squareroot of 0 = 0

so how is that infinity?
The zero is in the denominator...
 
Yes, I understand that, but how does dividing by zero make it infinity? Doesn't that make a number undefined?

I was always taught that means it's unsolvable
 
fatcats said:
Yes, I understand that, but how does dividing by zero make it infinity? Doesn't that make a number undefined?

I was always taught that means it's unsolvable
Well that may be true (I'm not a math expert), but think about what the value of that fraction does as v --> c from below. The KE rises without bound, right? That's the point, that the KE increases without bound as you try to get closer and closer to c (at least when you approach it from speeds v < c).
 
Okay, I think I understand
If you look at it as an equation, it's harder to see, but if you visualize it at as a graph that makes sense to me
Thanks for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
437
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K