MHB Finding 3 natural numbers by the rule of Sarrus

A.Magnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Here is a problem I am working on: Using the Rule of Sarrus:
$$\begin{vmatrix}
x & y & z \\
z & x & y \\
y & z & x \\
\end{vmatrix}
=x^3+y^3+z^3-3xyz,$$
find $x, y, z$ such that $x^3+y^3+z^3-3xyz = 315.$

And here is what I have gotten so far: By row and column operations and by factoring out $(x+y+z)$ from th determinant, I was able to reduce the determinant to this:
$$(x+y+z)
\begin{vmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
z & x-z & y-z \\
y & z-y & x-y \\
\end{vmatrix}
= (x+y+z) \bigg ((x-z)(x-y) - (y-z)(z-y) \bigg) = 315 = 3 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7.$$

I would love to make an equation out of $(x+y+z)$ with a combination of the factors of $3^2, 5$, or $7$ so that I can come up with the $x, y, z$ by trial and error. But the possibilities are simply way too many to be efficient. How should I go forward instead? As always, thank you for your time and gracious help. ~MA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MaryAnn said:
Here is a problem I am working on: Using the Rule of Sarrus:
$$\begin{vmatrix}
x & y & z \\
z & x & y \\
y & z & x \\
\end{vmatrix}
=x^3+y^3+z^3-3xyz,$$
find $x, y, z$ such that $x^3+y^3+z^3-3xyz = 315.$

And here is what I have gotten so far: By row and column operations and by factoring out $(x+y+z)$ from th determinant, I was able to reduce the determinant to this:
$$(x+y+z)
\begin{vmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
z & x-z & y-z \\
y & z-y & x-y \\
\end{vmatrix}
= (x+y+z) \bigg ((x-z)(x-y) - (y-z)(z-y) \bigg) = 315 = 3 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7.$$

I would love to make an equation out of $(x+y+z)$ with a combination of the factors of $3^2, 5$, or $7$ so that I can come up with the $x, y, z$ by trial and error. But the possibilities are simply way too many to be efficient. How should I go forward instead? As always, thank you for your time and gracious help. ~MA
I think you have made a good start. Next, I would re-write that large bracket by multiplying it out and rearranging it like this: $$(x-z)(x-y) - (y-z)(z-y) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -yz-zx-xy = (x+y+z)^2 - 3(yz+zx+xy).$$ Now let $s = x+y+z$ and $\sigma = yz+zx+xy$, so that the equation becomes $$s(s^2-3\sigma) = 3 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7.$$
We have to assume that there is a solution with $x$, $y$ and $z$ integers, otherwise we don't stand a chance. Making that assumption, you can see that $s$ must be a multiple of $3$. (If it isn't, then neither is $s^2$, nor $s^2-3\sigma$, so the product cannot be a multiple of $3$.) On the other hand, $s$ cannot be a multiple of $9$. (If it is, then $s^2-3\sigma$ is a multiple of $3$, so the product is a multiple of $27$, which is not the case.)

This tells you that the first plausible candidate for $s$ is $3 \cdot 5 = 15$. In that case, $s^2 = 225$ and we must have $s^2 - 3\sigma = 3\cdot7 = 21$. That leads to $\sigma = 68.$ So we are looking for three integers with sum $15$ whose products two at a time add up to $68.$ There is still a bit of trial and error involved here, but broadly speaking if the integers are close together then $\sigma$ will be large, whereas if they are very different then $\sigma$ will be small. For example, if $(x,y,z) = (5,5,5)$ then $\sigma = 75$. But if $(x,y,z) = (13,1,1)$ then $\sigma = 27.$

Over to you ... .
 
Opalg said:
I think you have made a good start. Next, I would re-write that large bracket by multiplying it out and rearranging it like this: $$(x-z)(x-y) - (y-z)(z-y) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 -yz-zx-xy = (x+y+z)^2 - 3(yz+zx+xy).$$ Now let $s = x+y+z$ and $\sigma = yz+zx+xy$, so that the equation becomes $$s(s^2-3\sigma) = 3 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7.$$
We have to assume that there is a solution with $x$, $y$ and $z$ integers, otherwise we don't stand a chance. Making that assumption, you can see that $s$ must be a multiple of $3$. (If it isn't, then neither is $s^2$, nor $s^2-3\sigma$, so the product cannot be a multiple of $3$.) On the other hand, $s$ cannot be a multiple of $9$. (If it is, then $s^2-3\sigma$ is a multiple of $3$, so the product is a multiple of $27$, which is not the case.)

This tells you that the first plausible candidate for $s$ is $3 \cdot 5 = 15$. In that case, $s^2 = 225$ and we must have $s^2 - 3\sigma = 3\cdot7 = 21$. That leads to $\sigma = 68.$ So we are looking for three integers with sum $15$ whose products two at a time add up to $68.$ There is still a bit of trial and error involved here, but broadly speaking if the integers are close together then $\sigma$ will be large, whereas if they are very different then $\sigma$ will be small. For example, if $(x,y,z) = (5,5,5)$ then $\sigma = 75$. But if $(x,y,z) = (13,1,1)$ then $\sigma = 27.$

Over to you ... .

Thank you very much for your gracious help and time. Looks like we have a good lead here. Allow me some times to look it over but in the meantime, please accept this posting as my acknowledgment of your help. Thank you again. ~MA
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
691
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K