Finding a Bijective Correspondence between X^{\omega} and a Proper Subset

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuelb88
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a bijective correspondence between the set of infinite tuples \(X^{\omega}\), where \(X\) is the two-element set \(\{0, 1\}\), and a proper subset of itself. The original poster seeks clarification on the nature of proper subsets within this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether \(X^{\omega - r}\), for some natural number \(r\), constitutes a proper subset of \(X^{\omega}\). Some participants suggest considering the implications of binary representation and the structure of tuples with specific leading elements.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different interpretations of proper subsets and bijections. A suggestion has been made to consider tuples with a fixed first element, which the original poster acknowledges and builds upon in their response.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the definitions and implications of infinite tuples and proper subsets, as well as the constraints of the problem statement regarding bijections.

Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let X be the two element set [itex]\{ 0 , 1 \}[/itex]. Find a bijective correspondence between [itex]X^{\omega}[/itex] and a proper subset of itself.


Homework Equations


Notation. [itex]X^{\omega}[/itex] is the set of all (infinite) [itex]{\omega}-\mathrm{tuples}[/itex] [itex](x_1 , x_2 , x_3 , ...)[/itex], where [itex]x_i \in X[/itex].


The Attempt at a Solution



My question is about the proper subset part...

I want to say in order to find any such bijection, I'll need to find another infinite proper subset of [itex]X^{\omega}[/itex]. My question is, does [itex]X^{\omega - r}[/itex], where [itex]r \in \mathbb{N}[/itex], constitute such a proper subset?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What would you suggest [itex]X^{\omega-r}[/itex] means? How would it differ from [itex]X^\omega[/itex]?

It might help to think about the binary representation of numbers.
 
To help you, consider the set of all tuples

[tex](0,x_2,x_3,x_4,...)[/tex]

so the set of all tuples with 0 as first element. Try to use that set somewhere...
 
That makes sense! I let [itex]\alpha = \{ A \in \{0,1\}^{\omega} : A = (0, x_1, x_2 , ...) \}[/itex] and define [itex]f: \{0,1\}^{\omega} \rightarrow \alpha[/itex] such that [itex]f(x_1, x_2, ...) = (0, x_1, x_2, ...)[/itex], that is, the function that shifts each coordinate position of any [itex]\omega[/itex]-tuple in [itex]\{0,1\}^{\omega}[/itex] "up by one" to compensate for the zero in the first coordinate position after I put it through my function. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K