Finding a Bijective Correspondence between X^{\omega} and a Proper Subset

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuelb88
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
Samuelb88
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let X be the two element set [itex]\{ 0 , 1 \}[/itex]. Find a bijective correspondence between [itex]X^{\omega}[/itex] and a proper subset of itself.


Homework Equations


Notation. [itex]X^{\omega}[/itex] is the set of all (infinite) [itex]{\omega}-\mathrm{tuples}[/itex] [itex](x_1 , x_2 , x_3 , ...)[/itex], where [itex]x_i \in X[/itex].


The Attempt at a Solution



My question is about the proper subset part...

I want to say in order to find any such bijection, I'll need to find another infinite proper subset of [itex]X^{\omega}[/itex]. My question is, does [itex]X^{\omega - r}[/itex], where [itex]r \in \mathbb{N}[/itex], constitute such a proper subset?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That makes sense! I let [itex]\alpha = \{ A \in \{0,1\}^{\omega} : A = (0, x_1, x_2 , ...) \}[/itex] and define [itex]f: \{0,1\}^{\omega} \rightarrow \alpha[/itex] such that [itex]f(x_1, x_2, ...) = (0, x_1, x_2, ...)[/itex], that is, the function that shifts each coordinate position of any [itex]\omega[/itex]-tuple in [itex]\{0,1\}^{\omega}[/itex] "up by one" to compensate for the zero in the first coordinate position after I put it through my function. Thanks!