Finding a Homogeneous D.E. that has a particular solution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding a homogeneous linear differential equation with constant coefficients that has a specific particular solution: yp = e^(-t) + 2te^(t) + t^(2)e^(t) - sin(3t). The correct differential operator form derived is (D+1)((D-1)^3)(D^(2) + 9)y = 0. The annihilators used include (D-1)^3 for the terms involving e^(t), (D+1) for e^(-t), and (D^(2) + 9) for sin(3t), confirming the solution's validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of homogeneous linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with differential operators
  • Knowledge of annihilators in differential equations
  • Basic calculus and differential equation solving techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of annihilators in depth
  • Learn about the method of undetermined coefficients for particular solutions
  • Explore the application of the superposition principle in linear differential equations
  • Investigate the simplification techniques for differential operator expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, mathematicians, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of homogeneous linear differential equations and their solutions.

Alex Ruiz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem reads:

Find a homogeneous linear differential equation with constant coefficients that has the following particular solution:

yp = e^(-t) + 2te^(t) + t^(2)e^(t) - sin(3t)

Express your equation in differential operator form. (Hint: What annihilators would you need to annihilate everything in this particular solution?)

Homework Equations



The annihilators that I put for each term were:

((D-1)^3) for (2te^(t) + t^(2)e^(t))

(D+1) for (e^(-t))

(D^(2) + 9) for (sin(3t))



The Attempt at a Solution



After plugging in I got:

(D+1)((D-1)^3)(D^(2) + 9)y = 0

I was wondering is this the correct answer since he stated to express the equation in differential operator form? Or is there another step I'm missing. If I'm doing this completley wrong I would greatly appreciate any clarity for this problem. Thank you in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks right to me. There may be some other simplification you could do, but I don't see anything wrong with what you have.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K