Finding a Unique Solution to a System of Equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions for determining unique solutions in a system of equations involving parameters a and b. Specifically, when a=2 and b≠-1, the system is inconsistent, leading to no solutions. Conversely, when a≠2 and b+4a²-4a-7≠0, the solution remains unique. Additionally, the case where a=2 and b=-1 results in infinitely many solutions. The participants clarify that the condition a≠2 and b+4a²-4a-7=0 also yields a unique solution, indicating redundancy in the original statement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically matrix rank
  • Familiarity with systems of equations and their solutions
  • Knowledge of back-substitution methods in solving equations
  • Basic proficiency in algebraic manipulation and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of matrix rank on the existence of solutions in linear systems
  • Learn about the conditions for unique solutions in systems of equations
  • Explore the concept of back-substitution in greater depth
  • Investigate the role of parameters in determining solution sets for linear equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to systems of equations.

The Head
Messages
137
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Find when the system of equations is unique:

x-y-2z-2w= 3
y+z+w= 4a+3
z+3w= -4a-4
(-a+2)w= b+4a^2-4a-7
Relevant Equations
Full Rank = Unique
It makes sense that a=2 would cause problems because then we wouldn't have a matrix of full rank and we'd be unable to determine a value for w. But the key also says that when b+4a^2-4a-7≠0. Why is that an issue? For example, if a=1, that just says implies that w=0. Through back-subsitution, we get z=-8, y=15, x=2. And the solution: (2, 15,-8, 0) is unique still because it's the only possible solution, right?

What am I missing here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct.

If ##a = 2## then there are no solutions, unless also ##b + 4a^2 -4a -7 = 0## when there are infinitely many. Is that what the book means?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: The Head
Hmm, yeah, maybe it was just the wording that is a little ambiguous. It says for a=2 AND b≠-1, the solution is inconsistent (makes sense, because then you get something like 0=1), for a≠2 AND b+4a^2-4a-7≠0, it is unique, and for a=2 AND b=-1 there are infinitely many solutions (also makes sense, since then you get 0=0). As long as I'm not missing something fundamental and the basic conditions I'm looking for are correct, I'm not too worried about it.

Thanks for helping out with this. I appreciate it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
The Head said:
Hmm, yeah, maybe it was just the wording that is a little ambiguous. It says for a=2 AND b≠-1, the solution is inconsistent (makes sense, because then you get something like 0=1), for a≠2 AND b+4a^2-4a-7≠0, it is unique, and for a=2 AND b=-1 there are infinitely many solutions (also makes sense, since then you get 0=0). As long as I'm not missing something fundamental and the basic conditions I'm looking for are correct, I'm not too worried about it.

Thanks for helping out with this. I appreciate it.
But that list leaves out a≠2 AND b+4a^2-4a-7=0, and as you say that case does yield a unique solution. So you are right, the "AND b+4a^2-4a-7≠0" is entirely redundant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: The Head

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
991
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K