Finding an Upper Bound for e^(-x^2) for Easy Integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Upper bound
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
20 replies · 11K views
Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0
Can anyone suggest an upper bound for [itex]e^{-x^2}[/itex] that can be integrated easily?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ted123 said:
Can anyone suggest an upper bound for [itex]e^{-x^2}[/itex] that can be integrated easily?

On what interval? Just guessing maybe ##[0,\infty)##? This is really easy. What have you thought of so far?
 
LCKurtz said:
On what interval? Just guessing maybe ##[0,\infty)##? This is really easy. What have you thought of so far?

I've just realized it's less than 1 for all x.
 
LCKurtz said:
You haven't answered the question about what interval, or told us what problem you are trying to solve.

It doesn't matter now; I know how to do it!
 
LCKurtz said:
Not if you were trying a comparison test on ##[0,\infty)##.

It's actually on a finite interval [itex][-n,n][/itex], but yes the integral of 1 would diverge on [itex][0,\infty)[/itex]
 
All I need to show is that [itex]\int_{-n}^n e^{-x^2} dx[/itex] converges as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex]. This is the last part of a bigger question where I'm trying to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem to show that [itex]e^{-x^2}[/itex] is Lebesgue integrable over [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex].

Since [itex]0 \leqslant e^{-x^2} \leqslant 1[/itex] and [itex]\int_{-n}^n 1 \; dx =0 \to 0[/itex] as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex] it follows from the comparison test that [itex]\int_{-n}^n e^{-x^2} dx[/itex] converges as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex].

(I'm not asked to find [itex]\int_{\mathbb{R}} e^{-x^2}[/itex], just to prove it is Lebesgue integrable using the MCT.)
 
D H said:
No, it isn't.

Oh yeah, it equals [itex]2n[/itex] which diverges as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex].

But doesn't that contradict the comparison test?

I'm trying to show that [itex]\int_{-n}^n e^{-x^2}dx[/itex] converges, but the comparison test implies it diverges.
 
Yep, it diverges, assuming you mean as [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}[/itex]. Why do you think it converges?
 
Whovian said:
Yep, it diverges, assuming you mean as [itex]\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty}[/itex]. Why do you think it converges?

Well, OK. Let's start from scratch.

I'm trying to prove [itex]f(x) = e^{-x^2} \in L^1(\mathbb{R})[/itex] ; that is, that [itex]f[/itex] is Lebesgue integrable over [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex].

Let [itex]f(x) = e^{-x^2} \chi_{(-\infty , \infty)}(x)[/itex] and [itex]f_n = f \chi_{[-n,n]}[/itex].

Since [itex]f\geqslant 0[/itex], [itex](f_n)[/itex] is an increasing sequence of functions which converges everywhere to [itex]f[/itex].

We want to show that [itex]f[/itex] is integrable so it suffices to show [itex]\int f_n[/itex] converges as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex]. It then follows from the Monotone Convergence Theorem that [itex]f\in L^1 (\mathbb{R})[/itex] (and [itex]\int f = \lim_{n\to\infty} \int f_n[/itex]).

We use the given hint ("don't try to find [itex]\int f[/itex] ; integrate a simpler upper bound instead").

We see that [itex]f_n[/itex] is bounded by... The integral of this upper bound converges, so by comparison test [itex]\int f_n[/itex] converges.
 
Ted123 said:
Oh yeah, it equals [itex]2n[/itex] which diverges as [itex]n\to\infty[/itex].

But doesn't that contradict the comparison test?
Of course not. Given functions [itex]f(x)[/itex] and [itex]g(x)[/itex] such that [itex]0\le f(x) \le g(x)[/itex] for all x and such that [itex]\lim_{s\to\infty}\int_{-s}^s g(x) dx[/itex] diverges says nothing about the convergence or divergence of [itex]\lim_{s\to\infty}\int_{-s}^s f(x) dx[/itex].

There are plenty of positive definite functions [itex]f(x)[/itex] that are bounded from above by [itex]g(x)=1[/itex] whose integral over the real number line does converge. [itex]f(x)=\exp(-x^2)[/itex] is one such function.
 
D H said:
Of course not. Given functions [itex]f(x)[/itex] and [itex]g(x)[/itex] such that [itex]0\le f(x) \le g(x)[/itex] for all x and such that [itex]\lim_{s\to\infty}\int_{-s}^s g(x) dx[/itex] diverges says nothing about the convergence or divergence of [itex]\lim_{s\to\infty}\int_{-s}^s f(x) dx[/itex].

There are plenty of positive definite functions [itex]f(x)[/itex] that are bounded from above by [itex]g(x)=1[/itex] whose integral over the real number line does converge. [itex]f(x)=\exp(-x^2)[/itex] is one such function.

Oh yes, it's the other way around for divergence isn't it: if [itex]\int f(x) dx[/itex] diverges then so does [itex]\int g(x) dx[/itex].

OK, so I need an upper bound whose integral converges then. Any suggestions?
 
Ted123 said:
OK, so I need an upper bound whose integral converges then. Any suggestions?
No. That would be solving your homework for you.

Huge hint: if [itex]0\le a \le 1[/itex] then [itex]\sqrt a \ge a[/itex], and if [itex]a\ge1[/itex] then [itex]\sqrt a \le a[/itex].
 
Last edited:
Mentallic said:
What about something with [tex]xe^{-x^2}[/tex]

But if [itex]x<0[/itex] then [itex]e^{-x^2} > xe^{-x^2}[/itex]
 
D H said:
Do you care? exp(-x^2) is symmetric, so if the integral from 0 to infinity exists, then so does the integral from -infinity to infinity.

Bingo! If only I'd drawn a graph first...
 
Ted123 said:
But if [itex]x<0[/itex] then [itex]e^{-x^2} > xe^{-x^2}[/itex]

Not only that, but if [itex]0\leq x < 1[/itex] then it still holds that [itex]e^{-x^2} > xe^{-x^2}[/itex]
But it is clear that since [itex]e^{-x^2}[/itex] is symmetric about the y-axis as f(x)=f(-x), and the function is finite over [itex]x\in [0,1][/itex] then all you need to do is show that [itex]xe^{-x^2}[/itex] is convergent for [itex]x\in [1,\infty)[/itex].