Finding Angular Velocity of Bicyclist in Inward Circle

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity of a bicyclist leaning inward while moving in a circular path. Two methods were employed: one using forces and the other using torque, yielding different results for angular velocity. The forces method involved calculating centripetal force through integration, while the torque method evaluated the torque balance due to gravity and friction. The participants debated the correct treatment of the bicyclist's mass and the point of contact for torque calculations. Clarification was sought on the relationship between net torque and angular velocity, highlighting the complexities in the analysis.
Jzhang27143
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
Suppose that a bicyclist is moving in a circle of radius R, leaning inwards at an angle a from the verticle, and that the height of the person (h) is less than R but not negligible. I am trying to find the angular velocity the bicyclist must move at.

I tried doing this in two ways: using torque equilibrium and forces but I got different answers.

Using forces, I found the total centripetal force acting on the body using an integral. If the person is a rod of mass per length density q, the centripetal force on one piece of the rod of length dr and a distance r from the point of contact is q dr * w^2 (R - r sin a). After evaluating the integral, I got Mw^2 R - 1/2 M h w^2 sin a. This centripetal force came from friction at the point of contact. I used geometry to get friction /Mg = tan a so friction = Mg tan a. Equating this with the expression for the integral gave me w^2 = g/R tan a (1 - h/2R sin a)^-1.

However using torque, I found the differential expression of the torque to be q dr * w^2 (R - r sin a) r cos a. After evaluating the integral I got Mw^2 h cos a (R/2 - h/3 sin a). In the rotating reference frame, this must balance the torque due to gravity which is Mg h/2 sin a. Equating this gave me
w^2 = g/R tan a (1 - 2h/3R sin a)^-1.

I am convinced that the answer from the torque method is correct but I don't know what is wrong with my first method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I moved the thread to the homework section. I think you are supposed to treat the mass of the bicycle rider as a point at height h.

Jzhang27143 said:
I used geometry to get friction /Mg = tan a so friction = Mg tan a.
Why?

Torque around what?
 
mfb said:
I moved the thread to the homework section. I think you are supposed to treat the mass of the bicycle rider as a point at height h.

Why?

Torque around what?
If you draw a free body diagram of the person, the vector sum of the normal and friction forces should be parallel to the person's body so the two vectors form a right triangle with one of the angles being a. And torque is taken about the point of contact.

I think my mistake was saying that the friction force was the same as the sum of all the centripetal forces since they act at different points.
 
Jzhang27143 said:
If you draw a free body diagram of the person, the vector sum of the normal and friction forces should be parallel to the person's body so the two vectors form a right triangle with one of the angles being a. And torque is taken about the point of contact.
That may be true, but it's not clear to me. Taking torque about the point of contact leaves an unbalanced torque from gravity. That's ok, because there will be effectively an angular acceleration about the point of contact with the ground. But what is the relationship between that net torque and w?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
756
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
858
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K