Finding Angular Velocity of Bicyclist in Inward Circle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the angular velocity of a bicyclist leaning inward while moving in a circular path of radius R. The problem involves analyzing forces and torques acting on the bicyclist, who is modeled as a rod with a height h that is less than R.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore two methods: one based on torque equilibrium and the other on force analysis, leading to different expressions for angular velocity. Questions arise regarding the treatment of the bicyclist's mass and the application of friction and torque in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the assumptions made regarding the mass of the bicyclist and the point of contact for torque calculations. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between forces, torques, and angular velocity, with no clear consensus on the correctness of the approaches yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of drawing free body diagrams and considering the geometry of forces acting on the bicyclist. There are discussions about potential mistakes in equating friction forces with centripetal forces, as well as the implications of taking torques about different points.

Jzhang27143
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
Suppose that a bicyclist is moving in a circle of radius R, leaning inwards at an angle a from the vertical, and that the height of the person (h) is less than R but not negligible. I am trying to find the angular velocity the bicyclist must move at.

I tried doing this in two ways: using torque equilibrium and forces but I got different answers.

Using forces, I found the total centripetal force acting on the body using an integral. If the person is a rod of mass per length density q, the centripetal force on one piece of the rod of length dr and a distance r from the point of contact is q dr * w^2 (R - r sin a). After evaluating the integral, I got Mw^2 R - 1/2 M h w^2 sin a. This centripetal force came from friction at the point of contact. I used geometry to get friction /Mg = tan a so friction = Mg tan a. Equating this with the expression for the integral gave me w^2 = g/R tan a (1 - h/2R sin a)^-1.

However using torque, I found the differential expression of the torque to be q dr * w^2 (R - r sin a) r cos a. After evaluating the integral I got Mw^2 h cos a (R/2 - h/3 sin a). In the rotating reference frame, this must balance the torque due to gravity which is Mg h/2 sin a. Equating this gave me
w^2 = g/R tan a (1 - 2h/3R sin a)^-1.

I am convinced that the answer from the torque method is correct but I don't know what is wrong with my first method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I moved the thread to the homework section. I think you are supposed to treat the mass of the bicycle rider as a point at height h.

Jzhang27143 said:
I used geometry to get friction /Mg = tan a so friction = Mg tan a.
Why?

Torque around what?
 
mfb said:
I moved the thread to the homework section. I think you are supposed to treat the mass of the bicycle rider as a point at height h.

Why?

Torque around what?
If you draw a free body diagram of the person, the vector sum of the normal and friction forces should be parallel to the person's body so the two vectors form a right triangle with one of the angles being a. And torque is taken about the point of contact.

I think my mistake was saying that the friction force was the same as the sum of all the centripetal forces since they act at different points.
 
Jzhang27143 said:
If you draw a free body diagram of the person, the vector sum of the normal and friction forces should be parallel to the person's body so the two vectors form a right triangle with one of the angles being a. And torque is taken about the point of contact.
That may be true, but it's not clear to me. Taking torque about the point of contact leaves an unbalanced torque from gravity. That's ok, because there will be effectively an angular acceleration about the point of contact with the ground. But what is the relationship between that net torque and w?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K