Finding basis of spaces and dimension

  • Thread starter Thread starter maximade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Dimension
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding a basis for the space of 2x2 matrices A = [a b; c d] in R^(2x2) under the constraint a + d = 0. The correct basis consists of the matrices [1 0; 0 0], [0 1; 0 0], and [0 0; 1 0], leading to a dimension of 3. The relationship d = -a is established, clarifying how any matrix in this space can be expressed as a linear combination of the basis elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with linear combinations and spanning sets
  • Knowledge of matrix representation and operations
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, including basis and dimension
NEXT STEPS
  • Study linear algebra concepts, focusing on vector spaces and bases
  • Learn about linear combinations and how they relate to matrix operations
  • Explore the properties of matrices in R^(2x2) and their dimensions
  • Investigate the implications of constraints on matrix elements, such as a + d = 0
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone seeking to understand the structure of vector spaces and matrix representations.

maximade
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a basis for each of the spaces and determine its dimension:
The space of all matrices A=[a b, c d] (2x2 matrix) in R^(2x2) such that a+d=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So I jumped at this question without knowing too much about spaces and dimensions, but:
I think a possible combination of basis can be: [1 0, 0 0]. [0 1, 0 0]. [0 0, 1 0] (not sure if [0 0, 0 -1] would be considered since d would be negative in this case) Also from that I assume the dimension is 3?
Truthfully even if I got it right, I do not even know what happened. Can someone conceptually tell me what I am doing exactly?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you need to come up with a basis, that has elements, such that any 2x2 matrix with a=d can be written as a linear sum of the basis elements.

clearly the basis elements will need to satisfy being a 2x2 matrix with d=a, you first element does not
 
note this is entirely equivalent to considering 4 component vectors in R^4, with x_1 = x_4

often the vector form is easier to conceptualise
 
Last edited:
lanedance said:
you need to come up with a basis, that has elements, such that any 2x2 matrix with a=d can be written as a linear sum of the basis elements.

clearly the basis elements will need to satisfy being a 2x2 matrix with d=a, you first element does not

Can you explain to me how d=a, since a+d=0?
Also since I am actually having a hard time learning this on my own, can you tell me what you mean by "elements" and "linear sum"?
 
maximade said:
Can you explain to me how d=a, since a+d=0?
Also since I am actually having a hard time learning this on my own, can you tell me what you mean by "elements" and "linear sum"?
good pickup, should be a = -d

if you're not familair with those terms, you may need to do a bit of reading.. though i have been a little loose with terminiology

in post #4 i actually meant component and have changed accordingly

a basis, is a set of vectors that spans a vector space

an element is a member of a set, for example a vector in the basis set

a linear combination (or sum) is a vector addition with scalar multiplication
eg. if u,v are vectors, and a,b are scalars, then
w = au + bv is a linear combination

a set, S, of vectors spans a space if any vector in the space can be written as a linear combination of vectors in S
 
From a+ d= 0 you get d=-a as you say. You can then write
\begin{bmatrix}a & b \\ c & d\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}a & b \\ c & -a\end{bmatrix}
= \begin{bmatrix}a & 0 \\ 0 & -a\end{bmatrix}+ \begin{bmatrix}0 & b \\ 0 & 0\end{bmatrix}+ \begin{bmatrix}0 & 0 \\ c & 0\end{bmatrix}
and the dimension and a basis should be clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K