Finding Components of Velocity on a Ramp

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natalie456
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Ramp
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a rock sliding down a frictionless ramp, where participants are tasked with finding the components of the rock's velocity at the bottom of the ramp. The problem is set within the context of kinematics, with specific restrictions on the use of certain equations and methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the angle of the ramp and the time taken to slide down, questioning if a smaller angle results in less time. They discuss the components of acceleration and whether the rock has both x and y components of acceleration. Some suggest breaking down the gravitational force into components along the ramp.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the problem setup and the implications of the restrictions on methods. There is a recognition of the challenges posed by the problem's wording and the need to establish certain relationships without using Newton's laws. Guidance has been offered regarding the acceleration along the ramp.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of not being allowed to reorient the coordinate system and the limitations on using work-energy equations or Newton's laws, which complicates the analysis of the problem.

Natalie456
Messages
16
Reaction score
2
I'm new to this, so I'm sorry if I am doing this process incorrectly. I feel like the answer to this should be straightforward and should just be √(2Lgsinθ). For some reason, I thought there was an acceleration vector along the ramp made up of x and y components, but I don't think this is accurate. My reasoning for this was that the rock is moving in both the negative y and positive x directions, and, since it starts at rest, it will need to accelerate in both of those directions so that it can move in those directions.

1. Homework Statement

A rock is sliding down a frictionless ice ramp of length L and angle theta to the horizontal. It has an initial velocity of 0. You are not allowed to reorient the coordinate plane so that the x-axis is along the ramp. What are the components of the rock's velocity at the bottom of the ramp?

Homework Equations


We aren't allowed to use the work-energy equations or Newton's laws, only kinematics formulas.
Formulas:
1.v=v0+at

2.Δx=v0t + .5at^2

3.v^2=v0^2+2aΔx

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I overcomplicated the problem because of the different axis orientation.

Δy=Lsinθ=.5(g)(t)^2 -- assuming ay=-g
--> time to travel down ramp=√(2Lsinθ/g)
Δx=Lcosθ=.5(ax)(2Lsinθ/g)
ax=gcotθ
vx=√(2Lgcotθcosθ)
vy=√(2Lgsinθ)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

Natalie456 said:
time to travel down ramp=√(2Lsinθ/g)
According to this equation, it looks like the smaller the angle, the less time it takes to travel down the ramp. Can that be?
 
TomHart said:
Welcome to Physics Forums.According to this equation, it looks like the smaller the angle, the less time it takes to travel down the ramp. Can that be?
I hadn't even thought of that. Do you happen to know how to make sense of this problem using solely kinematics equations? Does the rock have x and y components of acceleration?
 
I had a hard time making sense of it. Although I thought that the acceleration along the ramp due to the gravitational force might be equal to gsinθ. Then if you broke that down into x and y components, you would have the x component ax = gsinθcosθ, and the y component ay = gsinθsinθ.
You might try working it that way. You can always check it using the normal way of solving the problem.
 
TomHart said:
I had a hard time making sense of it. Although I thought that the acceleration along the ramp due to the gravitational force might be equal to gsinθ. Then if you broke that down into x and y components, you would have the x component ax = gsinθcosθ, and the y component ay = gsinθsinθ.
You might try working it that way. You can always check it using the normal way of solving the problem.
Thanks. I'll give that a shot.
 
Natalie456 said:
ay=-g
You mean, it will descend at the same vertical rate as if the ramp were not there?
TomHart said:
the acceleration along the ramp due to the gravitational force might be equal to gsinθ
Quite so, but I am baffled as to how the student is expected to determine that without recourse to Newton's laws. And how else is one to determine the horizontal and vertical components of the acceleration?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Natalie456 and TomHart
haruspex said:
You mean, it will descend at the same vertical rate as if the ramp were not there?

Quite so, but I am baffled as to how the student is expected to determine that without recourse to Newton's laws. And how else is one to determine the horizontal and vertical components of the acceleration?
So I would need to use Newton's Laws? I will try using that knowledge, as well. Also, can I state that a=gsinθ along the ramp if the axis for this problem is not to be set along the ramp? Thank you for your time.
 
Natalie456 said:
can I state that a=gsinθ along the ramp if the axis for this problem is not to be set along the ramp?
Whether you eventually work in terms of an axis parallel to the ramp or horizontal and vertical axes, at some point you need to establish that the acceleration parallel to the ramp is gsinθ. But I do not see how you can do that without using Newton's laws.
 
haruspex said:
Whether you eventually work in terms of an axis parallel to the ramp or horizontal and vertical axes, at some point you need to establish that the acceleration parallel to the ramp is gsinθ. But I do not see how you can do that without using Newton's laws.
Thank you so much! I guess the wording of the problem and my teacher's strictness with regards to the axis threw me off, initially, but now I understand. Thanks, again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K