Finding Constant \alpha_M in SET Definition

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the constant α_M in the stress-energy tensor definition for various matter fields, as presented by Wald. It highlights the relationship between the action S_M, the Lagrangian density, and the Einstein-matter field equations, emphasizing the need for a consistent prescription to determine α_M for arbitrary Lagrangians. Examples are provided for specific fields, such as the Klein-Gordon and electromagnetic fields, illustrating the variations in α_M values. The conversation acknowledges the potential for differing conventions in defining these constants across various formulations. Understanding how to derive α_M is crucial for accurately applying the Einstein equations in different contexts.
elfmotat
Messages
260
Reaction score
2
So I was looking through Wald when I noticed his definition of the stress-energy for an arbitrary matter field:

T_{ab}=-\frac{\alpha_M}{8\pi} \frac{1}{ \sqrt{-g}} \frac{\delta S_M}{\delta g^{ab}}

where S_M is the action for the particular type of matter field being considered, and \alpha_M is some constant that determines the form of the Lagrangian for the coupled Einstein-matter field equations:

\mathcal{L}=R\sqrt{-g}+\alpha_M \mathcal{L}_M

For example, for a Klein-Gordon field we take \alpha_{KG}=16\pi, and for an EM field we take \alpha_{EM}=4. Now, my question is whether or not there is some prescription for finding the value of \alpha_M. How could I go about finding \alpha_M for an arbitrary \mathcal{L}_M?

I feel like I'm missing something painfully obvious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess everybody has his own conventions. The usual ones follow.

The Einstein Equations are Gμν = 8πG Tμν. To get this equation we use an action I = IG + IM where IG = (1/16πG) ∫√-g R d4x and Tμν = (2/√-g) δIM/δgμν.

For electromagnetism, L = (-1/4)FμνFμν. This is in Heaviside units where e2/4πħc = 1/137. In Gaussian units where e2/ħc = 1/137, the Lagrangian would instead be IM = (-1/16π)FμνFμν.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
882
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K