Finding Disjoint Partitions of a Set: A Problem Solved

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    partitions Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of finding disjoint partitions of a set, specifically focusing on a set A with four elements and two partitions S_1 and S_2, each with three subsets. Participants explore definitions and properties of partitions, particularly regarding disjointness and the nature of the subsets involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question whether the subsets in the partitions must be collections of sets or if they can simply be sets of numbers. There is also a discussion about the definition of disjoint partitions and whether it implies that the subsets cannot share any elements.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing definitions and examples of partitions. Some clarification has been offered regarding the requirements for a valid partition, but confusion remains about the implications of disjointness and the structure of the subsets.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the textbook definitions and explore whether certain configurations of subsets qualify as partitions. There is an emphasis on understanding the definitions rather than reaching a definitive conclusion.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
I was given a problem where I was to find two disjoint partitions, S_1 and S_2 and a set A such that |A| = 4 and |S_1| = 3 and |S_2| = 3.

Now the set I was using and the book eventually used was A = {1,2,3,4} and S_1 ={{1},{2},{3,4}} and S_2 ={{1,2},{3},{4}}.

The question I have is probably a few definition questions that the book just doesn't seem to be clear about. Do the S's have to be a collection of sets and not simply a set of numbers? For example, is S_1 = {1,2,3} not a correct partition?

Also, the text asks for "disjoint" partitions, which I assume means S_1 and S_2 don't share any elements. However, isn't this part of the definition of a partition? That is, any two sets don't share any elements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A partition of a set A is a collection that simply separates every element of the set A into disjoint non-empty subsets. Every element of the set A must appear once and only once in one of the subsets of the partition. S_1 = {{1,2,3}} is not a partition of the set A since 4 does not appear is any of the subsets. However, S_1 = {{1,2,3}, {4}} would be a partition, however its cardinality would be 2.

It is true that a partition is always a collection of disjoint subsets, however it is possible to have two partitions that are not disjoint, but distinct. For example S_1={{1,2}, {3}, {4}} and S_2={{1,3}, {2}, {4}} would be two distinct partitions of A, both with cardinality 3, however they are not disjoint because they share the element (of a partition which is a subset) {4}.
 
Last edited:
Ok, I think my text is a bit confusing as it made it seem like S1 and S2 were required to make the set A.

For example, would S = {{1,2,3,4}} be a partition of A? And would S={1,2,3,4} be a partition of A?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
969
Replies
1
Views
2K