Finding displacement using net work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 2 kg particle moving in the positive x direction, subjected to a time-dependent force. The participants are exploring how to determine the displacement of the particle when it comes to a stop, using concepts of work, energy, and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration, and how to express velocity and displacement as functions of time. There is an exploration of integrating acceleration to find velocity and subsequently displacement.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on rewriting equations and integrating to find velocity and displacement. There are ongoing checks of calculations and integration results, with some participants questioning the correctness of the derived expressions.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of needing to use differential equations and the importance of ensuring the integration is performed correctly. Participants are also considering the implications of significant figures in their final results.

ooohffff
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
This post does not use the homework template because it was originally posted in a non-homework forum.

Homework Statement


The question is: A 2 kg particle is moving in the positive x direction with the speed of 5 m/s. As it passes the origin, a force F = (30 N - 2N/s*t)i is applied to it. Where does the particle come to a stop?

Homework Equations


F=ma
W = integral F(x)dx
K=.5mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution


K1 = .5(2)(5)^2 = 25 J
K2 = .5(2)(0)^2 = 0 J
W = K2-K1= -25 J

My main issue is I'm not sure how to rewrite the force equation in terms of x, since I can use it in the formula Work = integral F(x)dx from 0 to x to solve for x.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I deleted my previous post. I think the suggestion was not correct. You need to first write v as a function of t and find the value of t for which v=0. Then you should write displacement x as a function of time and put the value of t to get the displacement. You'll need differential equations for this. What is the relation between v, F and t?
 
F=ma=m(v/t)
cnh1995 said:
I deleted my previous post. I think the suggestion was not correct. You need to first write v as a function of t and find the value of t for which v=0. Then you should write displacement x as a function of time and put the value of t to get the displacement. You'll need differential equations for this.

So since F=ma, I divided the force vector by 2kg, giving me an acceleration vector of a=(15-t)i

Taking the integral of that, I would get a velocity vector of v = (15t - .5t^2 + 5)i. Set v=0, then I get t=30.33 s.

Does that look right so far?
 
ooohffff said:
F=ma=m(v/t)So since F=ma, I divided the force vector by 2kg, giving me an acceleration vector of a=(15-t)i

Taking the integral of that, I would get a velocity vector of v = (15t - .5t^2 + 5)i. Set v=0, then I get t=30.33 s.

Does that look right so far?
Yes.
 
cnh1995 said:
Yes.

Ok, so the final result doesn't look right...So taking the integral of v, I get x=[-1.5t^3 + 7.5t^2 + 5t]i . Plugging in 30.33 s, I get x = -384803.29
 
ooohffff said:
Ok, so the final result doesn't look right...So taking the integral of v, I get x=[-1.5t^3 + 7.5t^2 + 5t]i . Plugging in 30.33 s, I get x = -384803.29
Check the integration again. The answer comes out to be positive.
 
cnh1995 said:
Check the integration again. The answer comes out to be positive.

Oops, you're right, it should be (-1/6)t^3 not (-3/2)t^3. And the answer comes out to 2400 m
 
ooohffff said:
Oops, you're right, it should be (-1/6)t^3 not (-3/2)t^3. And the answer comes out to 2400 m
Right. 2400.82...
 
cnh1995 said:
Right. 2400.82...

Yup! I only need 2 sig figs, though. Thank you so much for your help!
 
  • #10
ooohffff said:
Thank you so much for your help!
No problem! And welcome to Physics Forums!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K