Finding Displacements for forced oscillations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle of mass m attached to a spring with force constant k, subjected to a constant downward force F for a duration t_0. The objective is to analyze the displacement of the mass from its equilibrium position after the force is removed, incorporating concepts from dynamics and oscillatory motion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the dynamics of the system during two intervals: while the force is applied and after it is removed. They discuss the equations of motion and the conditions at the transition point t = t_0.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the equilibrium position and the continuity of the displacement function at t_0. There are ongoing attempts to clarify the definitions of variables and the relationships between them, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential confusion regarding variable definitions and the continuity of the displacement function across the two time intervals. There is a focus on ensuring that the equations accurately reflect the physical situation described in the problem statement.

Jacobpm64
Messages
235
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle of mass [tex]m[/tex] is at rest at the end of a spring (force constant [tex]= k[/tex]) hanging from a fixed support. At [tex]t = 0[/tex], a constant downward force [tex]F[/tex] is applied to the mass and acts for a time [tex]t_0[/tex]. Show that, after the force is removed, the displacement of the mass from its equilibrium position ([tex]x = x_0[/tex], where [tex]x[/tex] is down) is
[tex]x - x_0 = \frac{F}{k}[cos \omega_0(t-t_0) - cos \omega_0 t][/tex]​
where [tex]\omega_0^2 = \frac{k}{m}[/tex].


Homework Equations


Newton's 2nd law [tex]F = ma[/tex] and knowing how to solve second order linear ODEs.



The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so I have no idea if what I'm doing is right, but I've been working on this (trying different things) for about 6 hours now.. It's painful. So, any assistance would be appreciated.

First, I split this thing into two parts.. one after the force is removed and one while the force is applied.

After force is removed: ([tex]t \geq t_0[/tex] and [tex]t = 0[/tex])
[tex]mg - kx = m \ddot{x}[/tex]
[tex]\ddot{x} + \omega_0^2 x = g[/tex]
We know [tex]x(t) = Acos(\omega_0 t - \phi ) + \frac{g}{\omega_0^2}[/tex].
We also know that at [tex]t = 0, x = x_0,[/tex] so:
[tex]x_0 = Acos\phi + \frac{g}{\omega_0^2}[/tex]
Now, the displacement from the equilibrium is:
[tex]x - x_0 = Acos(\omega_0 t - \phi ) - Acos\phi[/tex]
Simplifying, [tex]x - x_0 = A[cos(\omega_0 t - \phi ) - cos\phi][/tex]

While the force is applied: ([tex]0 < t \leq t_0[/tex])
[tex]F + mg - kx = m \ddot{x}[/tex]
[tex]\ddot{x} + \omega_0^2 x = \frac{F + mg}{m}[/tex]
So, [tex]x_2 (t) = Acos(\omega_0 t - \phi) + \frac{F+mg}{m\omega_0^2}[/tex]



Now, at [tex]t = t_0[/tex], we know [tex]x = x_2[/tex], so,
[tex]Acos(\omega_0 t_0 - \phi ) + \frac{g}{w_0^2} = Acos(\omega_0 t_0 - \phi) + \frac{F+mg}{m\omega_0^2}[/tex]
But this gives me [tex]F = 0[/tex] which is of course true, because [tex]t = t_0[/tex] is the time when the force is removed. I just do not know where to go and if this is helpful at all. Eventually, i want to have [tex]A = \mbox{something}[/tex] so that i can plug that into my equation for displacement from the equilibrium [tex]x - x_0[/tex] above.

What am I doing wrong? What should I do? Where should I go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the force is applied at t=0, for a time [itex]t_0[/itex], doesn't that mean

[tex]F+mg-kx=m\ddot{x}, \;\;\;\;\; 0\leq t\leq t_0[/tex]

[tex]mg-kx=m\ddot{x}, \;\;\;\;\; t> t_0[/tex] so that your equilibrium position is actually [itex]x_0=A\cos(\phi) + \frac{F+mg}{m\omega_0^2}[/itex]?
 
okay, so, using your advice.. I have, as you said..

[tex]x_0 = A\cos(\phi) + \frac{F+mg}{m\omega_0^2}[/tex]

Therefore, our displacement from equilibrium is:

[tex]x - x_0 = A[cos(\omega_0 t - \phi) - cos\phi] - \frac{F}{m\omega_0^2}[/tex]

Still though, when we have time [tex]t = t_0[/tex], [tex]x = x_2[/tex]. This still cancels the [tex]Acos(\omega_0 t_0 - \phi)[/tex] from both sides and leaves [tex]F = 0[/tex]. Again, I don't know where to go from here to clean up the expression for [tex]x - x_0[/tex].
 
I think you are confusing yourself by using the same variables to represent the amplitude and phase of the oscillation during both intervals...

During the interval [itex]0\leq t\leq t_0[/itex] you have:

[tex]x (t) = A_1\cos(\omega_0 t - \phi_1) + \frac{F+mg}{m\omega_0^2}[/tex]

and during the interval [itex]t\geq t_0[/itex], you have:

[tex]x (t) = A_2\cos(\omega_0 t - \phi_2) + \frac{g}{\omega_0^2}[/tex]

Use the fact that [itex]x(0)=x_0[/itex] and [itex]x(t)[/itex] and [itex]x('t)[/itex] must be continuous at [itex]t_0[/itex]...
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K