Finding Equations for Plane Containing Intersection of Quadric Surfaces

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Infernorage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surfaces
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding equations for a plane that contains the intersection of two quadric surfaces defined by the equations x^2+2y^2-z^2+3x=1 and 2x^2+4y^2-2z^2-5y=0. Participants are exploring methods to identify the surfaces and derive the plane equation, focusing on both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on how to express the given equations in standard quadric surface form, considering completing the square as a potential method.
  • Another participant confirms that completing the square is a reasonable approach and asks for the results of this method.
  • A participant provides their completed equations, suggesting that both surfaces appear to be hyperboloids of one sheet, but expresses uncertainty about this classification.
  • Some participants suggest looking at the intersection of the two surfaces as a way to simplify the problem and derive the plane equation.
  • One participant recommends rewriting the original equations to isolate z^2 in terms of x and y, proposing that this could lead to a more manageable equation for the intersection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to explore the intersection of the surfaces to find the plane equation. However, there is no consensus on the best method to approach the problem, and uncertainty remains regarding the classification of the surfaces and the steps to take for part "b".

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the mathematical steps necessary to find the intersection or the plane equation. There are also varying levels of comfort with the algebraic manipulations involved.

Infernorage
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem exactly how it is written on my paper...

Consider the surfaces x^2+2y^2-z^2+3x=1 and 2x^2+4y^2-2z^2-5y=0.
a. What is the name of each surface?
b. Find an equation for the plane which contains the intersection of these two surfaces.

That is the question. For "a", I generally know what needs to be done, but I can't figure out how to get the equations into the form of a standard quadric surface equation. Do I just complete the square, or what? Also, I really have no idea how to do "b". Can someone solve this and please explain to me how to do it? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Infernorage said:
Do I just complete the square, or what?.
This sounds like a reasonable place to start -- even if it doesn't work, it's still something to try. What'd you get after you did it? Why'd you abandon that line of attack?
 
Hurkyl said:
This sounds like a reasonable place to start -- even if it doesn't work, it's still something to try. What'd you get after you did it? Why'd you abandon that line of attack?

I got \frac{(x+3/2)^2}{13/4} + \frac{y^2}{13/8} - \frac{z^2}{13/4} = 1 and \frac{x^2}{25/128} + \frac{(y-5/8)^2}{25/256} - \frac{z^2}{25/128} = 1

Based on these equations it seems like they are both hyperboloid of one sheet surfaces. Is this correct? These answers seem a bit strange, which is why I made the thread on here to ask about it.

I really don't know what to do about "b" at all, I really need help with that.
 
I haven't multiplied it out, but those equations look roughly like I would expect.

For "b", it seems the obvious first thing to try is to look at the intersection of the two surfaces! It's the set of solutions to both equations, so you should be able to do some simplification.

Another idea that springs to mind is to try and think of some kind of information that would let you determine the plane -- and then try and compute that information.
 
Hurkyl said:
I haven't multiplied it out, but those equations look roughly like I would expect.

For "b", it seems the obvious first thing to try is to look at the intersection of the two surfaces! It's the set of solutions to both equations, so you should be able to do some simplification.

Another idea that springs to mind is to try and think of some kind of information that would let you determine the plane -- and then try and compute that information.

Sorry, but I am still unsure of how to start. How should I equate the two equations together to find the points of intersection? Can you start it for me and just show me what you would do? Thanks.
 
Yes, since both expressions are equal to 1, they are equal to each other. Although, instead of the rather complicated expressions you derived, I would recommend going back to x^2+ 2y^2- z^2+ 3x- 1= 0= 2x^2+ 4y^2- 2z^2- 5y. You can solve that for, say, z^2 in terms of x and y and put that back into the original equations to get an equation is x and y. Then solve for either x or y in terms of the other and, perhaps, use the remaining variable as parameter.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K