Finding force between charge sphere given r,ε,a,v

kevin_tee
Messages
80
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


This is not homework but it's kind of similar so may be I will post it here. I want to find the force between two charge sphere given radius, permittivity,distance, and voltage by diverge other equation to coulomb's law.


Homework Equations


Coulomb law F=k Q1 Q2 /r2
F = force
k = electric constant
Q = electrostatic quality
r= distance

Voltage-dependent capacitors Q=CV
Q = electrostatic quality
C = capacitance
V = voltage

Capacitance of sphere C=4πεa
C = capacitance
ε = permittivity
a = radius


The Attempt at a Solution


1. F=k Q1 Q2 /r2 start with Coulomb's law
2. F=k (CV)1 (CV)2/r2 replace Q with CV since Q=CV
3. F=k (4πεaV)1 (4πεaV)2/r2 replace C with 4πεa since C=4πεa

So F=k (4πεaV)1 (4πεaV)2/r2

Is this correct, I replace voltage-dependent capacitors and capacitance of sphere equation into coulomb law to find how much force is acting on it. So when I evaluate radius, permittivity,distance, and voltage it should gives me amount of force.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are thinking that r>>a and V is measured wrt the edge of the Universe?
 
Simon Bridge said:
You are thinking that r>>a and V is measured wrt the edge of the Universe?

r is distance between two metal ball and a is radius of the ball. I don't really understand what you mean edge of the universe? V is voltage ex.30000 volts.
 
The "voltage" is always a value at some place that is compared with a value at some other place.
So if you have 30000V on each sphere, where is the place that has 0V?

I'm trying to check the geometry you have in mind - I can make guesses from the equations you choose but that only takes me so far. If I am to answer your question properly I have to know what you intended rather than what I think you may have intended.

If r is the separation of the centers (you didn't say - maybe it's the separation between the surfaces?), then r>a means the balls are totally separate and r>>a means the distance between the balls is large compared with the radius of the balls. Initially I thought you were thinking of concentric shells - but the radii are the same so it's not that. I'm also guessing that by "electrostatic quality" you mean "electric charge".

Assuming something like - conducting balls equal radius a, equal charge Q, one centered at z=-r/2 and one at z=+r/2 where r > a, then:

The equation you use for capacitance is for a conducting sphere by itself (which is the same as for two concentric spheres, with the outer sphere radius infinity). This has a uniform charge distribution. Introduce another charged sphere and the charge distribution is no longer uniform so the equation may no longer be valid. How did you check?

How were you including the effect, if any, of the capacitance between the two balls?

I think you'd do better looking at energy considerations instead of forces.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top