Finding H(s) for Circuit in s-Domain

  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 6K views
VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the circuit below, find H(s) = [tex]\frac{I_0(s)}{I_S(s)}[/tex]

http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/7136/problem146td5.jpg

Homework Equations



Inductor in the s-domain: [itex]j\omega[/itex](Inductor Value)

The Attempt at a Solution



I made a new circuit diagram for the s-domain:

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/7284/problem146part2gg0.jpg

[tex]i_1\,=\,\frac{V_1}{1\Omega}[/tex] [tex]i_2\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{j\omega}[/tex] [tex]i_3\,=\,\frac{V_2}{j\omega}[/tex] [tex]I_0(\omega)\,=\,\frac{V_2}{1\Omega}[/tex]KCL @ [itex]V_1[/itex]:

[tex]I_S(\omega)\,=\,i_1\,+\,i_2[/tex]

[tex]I_S(\omega)\,=\,V_1\,+\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{j\omega}[/tex]KCL @ [itex]V_2[/itex]:

[tex]i_2\,=\,i_3\,+\,I_0(\omega)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{j\omega}\,=\,\frac{V_2}{j\omega}\,+\,V_2[/tex]

After a couple of algebra moves(is it safe to multiply both sides by jw?), I get for [itex]V_1[/itex]:

[tex]V_1\,=\,V_2\left(2\,+\,j\omega\right)[/tex]

Substituting into the [itex]V_1[/itex] KCL equation:

[tex]I_S(\omega)\,=\,V_2\left(2\,+\,j\omega\right)\,+\,\frac{V_2\left(1\,+\,j\omega\right)}{j\omega}[/tex]

I also have this:

[tex]I_S(\omega)\,=\,i_1\,+\,i_3\,+\,I_0(\omega)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{I_0(\omega)}{I_S(\omega)}\,=\,1\,-\,\frac{i_1}{I_S(\omega)}\,-\,\frac{i_3}{I_S(\omega)}[/tex]

But how do I get rid of the i1 and i3? That would require ridding the equations of the V1 and V2 right? How to do that? I bet there is a much easier way of going about this. Does anyone know of an easier way?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
note [tex]I_0=V_2[/tex]
alternatively, you can use current divider formula a few times to solve this problem.
 
Ok, let's try again...

I am going to use s in place of jw.

[tex]I_S\,=\,V_1\,+\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{s}[/tex]

[tex]I_o\,=\,\frac{V_1\,-\,V_2}{s}\,-\,\frac{V_2}{s}[/tex]

What do I do now? This problem really sucks, and it's the first one in the assignment! Please help.
 
previously you arrived at
[tex]I_S(\omega)\,=\,V_2\left(2\,+\,j\omega\right)\,+\, \frac{V_2\left(1\,+\,j\omega\right)}{j\omega}[/tex]

while I haven't check your final answer, but methods are all good. from here as I said before [tex]I_0=V_2[/tex]... so sub in and solve for [tex]I_0/I_s[/tex]
will get same answer as your latest trial once you set [tex]I_0=V_2[/tex]
 
[tex]I_S(\omega)\,=\,I_0\left(2\,+\,j\omega\right)\,+\, \frac{I_0\left(1\,+\,j\omega\right)}{j\omega}[/tex]

[tex]I_S(s)\,=\,I_0\left(2\,+\,s\right)\,+\,\frac{I_0\left(1\,+\,s\right)}{s}[/tex]

[tex]I_S(s)\,=\,I_0\left(3\,+\,s\,+\,\frac{1}{s}\right)[/tex]

Finally, I get:

[tex]\frac{I_0(s)}{I_S(s)}\,=\,\frac{1}{3}\,+\,\frac{1}{s}\,+\,s[/tex]

Is that the correct transfer function?
 
Last edited:
one should be confident with one's work...again I don't see a problem with the methods... to avoid silly mistakes like 2+3=6, just check your workings...