MHB Finding inverse of F in Munkres' Topology Ch.2 EX 5 pg 106

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
In Munkres book "Topology" (Second Edition), Munkres proves that a function F is a homeomorphism ...

I need help in determining how to find the inverse of $$F$$ ... so that I feel I have a full understanding of all aspects of the example ...

Example 5 reads as follows:View attachment 4193Wishing to understand all aspects of the problem I tried to see how given

$$ F(x) = \frac{x}{1 - x^2} $$

one could determine the inverse of $$F$$ (and then come up with $$G$$, as Munkres did ... ... somehow ??) ... ...I think I proceed by putting

$$y = \frac{x}{1 - x^2}$$

and solving for $$x$$ ... ... BUT how exactly do I proceed (I got nowhere with this problem!)Can someone please help?NOTE... I realize that being able to determine the inverse of F and show it is G is not strictly necessary in showing that F is a homeomorphism ... BUT ... I feel very dissatisfied that I cannot see exactly how this works ... so, again, I hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I tried to see how given

$$ F(x) = \frac{x}{1 - x^2} $$

one could determine the inverse of $$F$$ (and then come up with $$G$$, as Munkres did ... ... somehow ??) ... ...I think I proceed by putting

$$y = \frac{x}{1 - x^2}$$

and solving for $$x$$
If $$y = \frac{x}{1 - x^2}$$ then $yx^2 + x - y = 0$. Solving that quadratic equation for $x$, you get $x = \dfrac{-1 \pm\sqrt{1+4y^2}}{2y}$. You want the solution for which $x\in (-1,1)$, which means that you need the $+$ sign for the square root: $x = \dfrac{-1 + \sqrt{1+4y^2}}{2y}$. That looks different from the formula that Munkres gives for $G(y)$, but if you rationalise the denominator of his formula (multiplying top and bottom of his fraction by $-1 + \sqrt{1+4y^2}$) then you see that the two solutions are equivalent.
 
Opalg said:
If $$y = \frac{x}{1 - x^2}$$ then $yx^2 + x - y = 0$. Solving that quadratic equation for $x$, you get $x = \dfrac{-1 \pm\sqrt{1+4y^2}}{2y}$. You want the solution for which $x\in (-1,1)$, which means that you need the $+$ sign for the square root: $x = \dfrac{-1 + \sqrt{1+4y^2}}{2y}$. That looks different from the formula that Munkres gives for $G(y)$, but if you rationalise the denominator of his formula (multiplying top and bottom of his fraction by $-1 + \sqrt{1+4y^2}$) then you see that the two solutions are equivalent.
Thanks Opalg ... quite straightforward really... Another case of "easy when you know how" ...

Thanks again for your support and help with this problem ...

Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top