Finding Lower Bounds for {2, 4} using Partial Order

  • Thread starter Thread starter BubblesAreUs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Pair
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding all lower bounds for the pair {2, 4} within a specified partial order. The original poster presents a proof for the greatest lower bound and attempts to identify lower bounds based on the defined ordering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of lower bounds and the implications of the partial order defined on the set. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the notation used and the specific elements that serve as lower bounds. There is also discussion about the need for clarity on the nature of the elements being compared.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of lower bounds and the specific elements involved in the partial order. Some guidance has been offered regarding the identification of lower bounds, but there is no explicit consensus on the final interpretation or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the defined set T and the specific ordering rule applied. There is also mention of potential ambiguity in the notation used for the pairs and the need for further clarification on the elements being considered.

BubblesAreUs
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
Since I'm not sure if posting assignment questions is allowed, I'm just going to ask specific questions just to be safe.

1. Homework Statement


Find all the lower bounds of given pair. Say (a, b) in T.

Homework Equations



Proof for greatest lower bound:

∀g,a,b ∈ T ⇔ ( g ≺ a) ^ (g ≺ b) ^ ( ∀l ∈ T [ (l ≺ a ) ^ ( l ≺ b)] ⇒ (l ≺ g)

by "≺", I meant Partial Order, ≤

The Attempt at a Solution



Since g are ordered before a and b. Can we assume for pair {2, 4}, g will be equivalent to

{empty set}, {1,0}, {1,1}, {1,2}, {1,3}, {1,4}, {2, 1}, {2,2}, {2,3}, {2,4},

I am not sure if I'm on the right track, but that's what it seems to be according to the proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part 1 you write (a, b) which could be an ordered pair or an open interval in ℝ but then you use set notation in part 3. Those could have greatest lower bounds if there's a partial ordering defined on them but I think I need more info. Part 2 makes sense though, a lower bound different from g is less than g but what are they & how are they being compared?

edit: for example with {2, 4} ⊆ (ℕ, ≤) (meaning the set is ℕ & its partial order is ordinary < or =) the greatest lower bound is 2 & the other lower bound is 1. If {2, 4} ⊆ (ℤ, ≤) then the glb is still 2 but the other lower bounds are all the integers less than 2 .
 
Last edited:
So if the proof for lower bound was applied to the pair {2,4} in T.

∀g,2,4 ∈ T ⇔ ( g ≺ 2) ^ (g ≺ 4) ^ ( ∀l ∈ T [ (l ≺ 2 ) ^ ( l ≺ 4)] ⇒ (l ≺ g)

In other words, g comes before 2 and 4 while l comes before g. I'm trying to compute the lower bound of the given pair. I also forgot to mention that T = ( X8, ≺ ) where ≺ is defined on X8 = { 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8} by the rule x ≺ y ⇔ 5x ≤ 3y.

Therefore I was able to produce the pairs:

{empty set}, {0,0}, {0,1}, {0,2}, {0,3,}, {0,4}, {1,2}, {1,3}, {1,4}, {2,4},

Each of pairs produced go before their respective elements.

Is this correct?
 
Now that I understand how you got those pairs, once you know that ##2 \prec 4## because 5×2 ≤ 3×4 you don't need to compare 4 with any lesser elements because it obviously isn't a lower bound for {2, 4}. The way I understood the problem was that you want ##x \in X_{8}## such that ##x \prec 2##, in other words x such that 5×x ≤ 3×2 = 6 which I think you got but you need to give the elements (not subsets) of ##X_{8}## that are lower bounds of {2, 4}, which are 0, 1 & 2. The glb is 2 because it's the lower bound which is greater than the other ones.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K