Finding minimum force to pull the napkin out from under the tea cup

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
Jpyhsics
Messages
84
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


There is a table, and a napkin on it. The napkin has a mass mn=71.6 g. On the napkin, there is a tea cup with mass mc=104.6 g. What is the minimum force required for someone to pull the napkin out from under the tea cup? Assume that between the table and the napkin the friction is µk= 0.484, while the coefficient of static friction between the tea cup and the napkin is µs=0.705. Express your answer in Newtons.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


ΣFxNapkin=F-frC-frT (where C is cup and T is table)
ΣFxCup=frN (where N is napkin)

I have also included a photo of my FBD
How can I proceed with this question? Do I have a correct FBD?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_109F6D002955-1.jpeg
    IMG_109F6D002955-1.jpeg
    22.1 KB · Views: 505
Physics news on Phys.org
Jpyhsics said:
How can I proceed with this question? Do I have a correct FBD?
Your FBD looks fine.
What about the cup's acceleration?
 
haruspex said:
Your FBD looks fine.
What about the cup's acceleration?
Would the acceleration of the cup be equal to the acceleration of the napkin?
 
Jpyhsics said:
Would the acceleration of the cup be equal to the acceleration of the napkin?
Yes, or only very slightly less. So what equation can you write?
 
so would the cup acceleration be:
ackg ?
Which subsequently would be the acceleration of the napkin?

So would my solution in the picture make sense?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_E3E262A0D1DA-1.jpeg
    IMG_E3E262A0D1DA-1.jpeg
    28 KB · Views: 488
Jpyhsics said:
so would the cup acceleration be:
ackg ?
μk is the kinetic friction between the napkin and the table.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jpyhsics
Jpyhsics said:
Okay thanks!
Not sure how to interpret that response. I am telling you that your equation in post #5 makes no sense... and wondering if it was a typo.

Edit: I have marked the thread unsolved.
 
Last edited: