Finding positive orientation for a surface

Click For Summary
To determine the positive orientation of a surface parameterized by the vector function r(a,b), one must find the normal vector by calculating the cross product of the partial derivatives ra and rb. The orientation is defined arbitrarily, requiring additional context to designate one normal direction as positive. Typically, problems specify orientation by indicating a positive z component or by designating outward or inward normals for closed surfaces. The distinction between positive and negative orientations is not inherent and relies on external criteria. Understanding these conventions is essential for correctly identifying surface orientation in mathematical contexts.
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
If I parameterized a surface by the vector function r(a,b) I would then proceed to find the normal to the surface by crossing ra and rb. But how would I determine which normal raXrb or rbXra has the positive orientation?

Im assuming you would first need to know if the concave side of the surface is facing away or towards the origin? But from there I don't know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how it could be related to second order derivatives. Consider e.g. just moving around in the XY plane. Let's say the cross product is defined with a right-hand corkscrew rule, so (1,0,0)x(0,1,0) = (0,0,1). If increasing a moves r in the +ve x-direction and increasing b moves r in the +ve y-direction then raxrb is in the +ve z direction. But if you swap the sign of ra it will be in the negative z-direction.
 
The distinction between "positive" and "negative" orientation for a surface is purely arbitrary. A surface can have either of two "orientations", the normal vector pointing in either of two directions out of the surface. But to designate one of those as the "postive orientation" and the other as "negative orientation" requires some other information.

Could you give us the exact wording of an example. Usually such "surface orientation" probles will say "oriented by postive z component" or in the case of a closed surface oriented by "outward" or "inward" normals.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The distinction between "positive" and "negative" orientation for a surface is purely arbitrary. A surface can have either of two "orientations", the normal vector pointing in either of two directions out of the surface. But to designate one of those as the "postive orientation" and the other as "negative orientation" requires some other information.

Could you give us the exact wording of an example. Usually such "surface orientation" probles will say "oriented by postive z component" or in the case of a closed surface oriented by "outward" or "inward" normals.


I parameterized the surface
x = x
y = x^2+ z^2
z=z

Wrong picture look at the picture in post # 5
Now to find the orientation towards the origin do I do rxXrz or rzXrx?
 

Attachments

  • Orientation.jpg
    Orientation.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 583
Last edited:
Correct problem
 

Attachments

  • OR1.jpg
    OR1.jpg
    3.5 KB · Views: 580
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K