Surface integral of vector fields (sphere)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of a surface integral of a vector field over a half-sphere defined in three-dimensional space. The vector field is given as v(x,y,z) = (yz, 1, -xy), and the surface is specified by the equation x² + y² + z² = 1 with the constraint y ≥ 0. Participants are exploring methods for evaluating the integral efficiently, particularly in the context of exam preparation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to parametrize the surface using spherical coordinates and compute the integral step by step, expressing concerns about the time taken for the solution and the correctness of their orientation choice.
  • Some participants question the necessity of the detailed calculations, suggesting that recognizing the symmetry of the problem could lead to a quicker solution.
  • Others explore the implications of the vector field's components and how they relate to the surface area element in spherical coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing different perspectives on the problem. Some have offered alternative methods and insights into the symmetry of the integral, while others are seeking clarification on the reasoning behind specific steps. There is no explicit consensus yet, as participants are still exploring various interpretations and approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted potential confusion regarding notation and the implications of the surface's orientation. There is also mention of differing results, which may indicate varying interpretations of the integral's setup or calculations.

JulienB
Messages
408
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Hi everybody! I'm currently training at surface integrals of vector fields, and I'd like to check if my results are correct AND if there is any shortcut possible in the method I use. I'm preparing for an exam, and I found that it takes me way too much time to solve it. I estimated that I should have around 15 mins to solve such a problem during my exam, and I'm definitely not there yet. So the problem goes:

Calculate the oriented surface integral ##\int_F v \cdot dF##. The vector field is given by ##v(x,y,z) = (yz,1,-xy)##, the surface ##F## is given by ##F = \{ (x,y,z) \in \mathbb{R}^3 : x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1, y \geq 0 \}## and the normal vector on ##F## should be oriented towards the point of origin.

Homework Equations



Surface integrals, parametrisation of surfaces, vector calculus, partal derivatives

The Attempt at a Solution



Well okay here we go:

-First I notice that the equation of the surface describes a sphere with radius ##r=1## and center ##(0,0,0)##. The ##y \geq 0## indicates this is a half-sphere. So I parametrise the surface using spherical coordinates and I get:
##\phi(\varphi, \psi) = (\cos \varphi \sin \psi, \sin \varphi, \sin \psi, \cos \psi)## with ##\phi \in [0,\pi]## (because ##y \geq 0##) and ##\psi \in [0,\pi]##.

-Then I take the partial derivatives with respect to ##\varphi## and ##\psi## and get:
##\partial_{\varphi} \phi (\varphi, \psi) = (- \sin \varphi \sin \psi, \cos \varphi \sin \psi, 0)##
##\partial_{\psi} \phi (\varphi, \psi) = (\cos \varphi \cos \psi, \sin \varphi \cos \psi, - \sin \psi)##

-The partial derivatives forming a tangential plane on the surface, I take the vector product of the two in order to obtain a normal vector:
##\vec{n} = \pm || \partial_{\varphi} \phi (\varphi, \psi) \times \partial_{\psi} \phi (\varphi, \psi) ||##
##= \pm (\cos \varphi \sin^2 \psi, \sin \varphi \sin^2 \psi, \cos \psi \sin \psi)##

-I could jump directly to the integral (after choosing an orientation of course), but when I see such a vector as ##\vec{n}## I prefer to normalise it otherwise I'll be trapped in the middle of many trigonometric functions when doing the integral:
##\hat{n} = \pm (\cos \varphi \sin \psi, \sin \varphi \sin \psi, \cos \psi)##

-I choose an orientation by testing the direction of say ##\hat{n}_+## for a chosen point and see if it points towards the center of the sphere or not. I chose ##(\varphi, \psi) = (0,0)## and get that for point ##\phi (\varphi, \psi) = (0,0,1)## the vector has coordinates ##\hat{n}_+ = (0,0,1)##, which means it points in the opposite direction of the zero-point. Therefore, I define my normal vector as:
##\hat{n} = -(\cos \varphi \sin \psi, \sin \varphi \sin \psi, \cos \psi)##

-I can now do the integral:
##\int_F v \cdot dF = \int_S \vec{v} \cdot \hat{n} \cdot || \vec{n} ||\ d\varphi\ d\psi##
##= - \int_0^{\pi} \sin \varphi \int_0^{\pi} \sin^2 \psi\ d\psi\ d\phi##
##= - \frac{\pi}{2} \int_0^{\pi} \sin \varphi\ d\varphi##
##= -\pi##.

Is that correct? My principal doubts when doing this kind of integrals are always: did I choose the orientation right? Did I make no calculation mistake? And as I already mentioned above, I was wondering if there was a quickest way to solve those problems. This one definitely took me over half a hour, and I didn't really get stuck or anything. I often face more complicated ones and it can take over a hour then. Maybe it's just a question of practice.Thank you very much in advance for your reviews, remarks and suggestions. :)Julien.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see you do a lot of work in 3D, but oversee that for any vector ##\ \vec a = (x,y,z) \ ## the inner product ##\ \vec a \cdot \vec v = y ##. Couldn't that shorten the time to solve ? Like, down to the time needed for multiplying the area ##2\pi## with the number 1 ?

(a bit devious, but: I'm glad our results differ, so perhaps someone will put me right ! )

[edit] the 'number' isn't 1, it's 'y', so I'm the one who is wrong...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JulienB
Your notation is a bit confusing for me with ##\phi## and ##\varphi##. Never mind.

From symmetry I expect the integral is zero.
Doing the work I have ## | dF | = \sin\psi \;d\phi \;d\psi ## and ##y = \sin\phi\cos\psi ## so a ##\sin 2\psi## appears and that gets ##\int d\psi = 0##.

(a double wrong doesn't make a right, so I'll wait for confirmation).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JulienB
Hi @BvU and thanks for your answer. Yes I have seen that most people write the parameter function as ##\vec{r} (u,v)##. I also like it better, but my teacher must be in love with greek letters since the notation ##\phi (\varphi, \psi)## comes from him. I'm keeping it until the exam to not get confused, but I'll drop it directly afterwards since I generally prefer to use the latin alphabet to define functions.

Mm I have trouble with your second post seeing how you arrived there. Would you mind detailing a bit? Even if it ends up being wrong, I like to see how other people think and work.

Thanks a lot! :)Julien.
 
JulienB said:
second post seeing how you arrived there
So you have $$\int\limits_F \vec v\cdot\ \vec {dF}$$and ##\vec v \cdot\vec x = y ##.

Working in spherical coordinates is sensible, so that comes down to finding the y coordinate of ##\vec dF## in spherical coordinates.

##\vec {dF} = -\hat r \; \sin\psi \;d\psi\;d\varphi## a vector pointing inwards along ##\hat r## with a magnitude ##\sin\psi \;d\psi\;d\varphi## (the area of a chunk ##\;d\psi\;d\varphi## of the unit sphere where r2 = 1).

Its y-component is $$ -\sin\varphi\cos\psi\ \sin\psi \;d\psi\;d\varphi = - {1\over 2} \sin \varphi \sin 2\psi \;d\psi\;d\varphi$$ and the integration reads $$\int\limits_F\vec v\cdot\vec {dF} = - {1\over 2} \int\limits_{\varphi = 0}^{\pi\over 2} \int\limits_{\psi = 0}^{\pi\over 2} \sin \varphi \sin 2\psi \;d\psi\;d\varphi$$

Was that the idea ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K