Finding Potential and Charge across a Capacitor in a Multi-Loop Circuit

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 18K views
Adm_Thrawn
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 20.0 V battery is connected across capacitors of capacitances C1 = C6 = 2.9 μF and C3 = C5 = 2.00C2 = 2.00C4 = 4.7 μF.

http://imgur.com/ssxTC

What are
(c) V1 and (d) q1 of capacitor 1,


(e) V2 and (f) q2 of capacitor 2,


(g) V3 and (h) q3 of capacitor 3,



Homework Equations



Ceq = c+c+c+c in parallel, 1/Ceq = 1/c+1/c+1/c in series

C=q/V


The Attempt at a Solution



I solved A and B for this problem, namely, the equivalent capacitance, and the charge.

C4 = 2.35, C2 = 2.35, C3 = 4.7, C5 = 4.7, C1 = 2.9, C6 = 2.9

1/C5 + 1/C3 = 2.35 + C2 + C4 = 7.05

C1 + C6 = 5.8

1/7.05 + 1/5.8 = 3.18e-6, which is the correct value for the C equivalence

Thus, 3.18e-6 = q/V(20) = q = 63.6e-6F

After this, I formed a small loop with the battery, C4 and C6.

Their C = 2.35 + 2.9 = 5.25e-6 = q/V(20), such that q = 1.05e-4

V = q/C4 = 44.68, but I know this can't be right because the potential can't be greater than the original potential, 20

I'm not certain where to go from here, in terms of finding the potential across or charge across these 3 resistors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 1/7.05 is wrong and should be closer to 1/7.7 ? See,
 

Attachments

  • C043.jpg
    C043.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 2,344
Yeah, I got that at first too, but if you notice from the 'trick question', it's 2.00C4 = 4.7, and with algebra is 2.35. Then 2.00C2 = 2.00C4 = 2.35 as well.

I got the equivalent capacitance of the circuits correct, and the charge is also correct. It's just the potential over the resistors that I don't understand how to get.

Thanks for replying though.
 
I read it wrong, thanks for pointing that out. Will try again.
 
I got your numbers, minus some rounding errors. See,

The thing to remember is the charge on two capacitors in series is the same and the voltage on capacitors in parallel is the same.

Good luck!
 

Attachments

  • C044.jpg
    C044.jpg
    31.2 KB · Views: 2,428
  • C2045.jpg
    C2045.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 1,911