Finding R,L,C at resonant state

  • Thread starter Thread starter MissP.25_5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonant State
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
MissP.25_5
Messages
329
Reaction score
0
Hello again. I hope someone could check if I got the answers correct.

The magnitude of the current I in resonant state was 3[A]. When the angular frequency of the power supply was 1 [rad/s] and 2[rad/s], the magnitude of current I became 1/√2 of the value when resonance occurred. Find R, L, C.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4389.jpg
    IMG_4389.jpg
    42.9 KB · Views: 520
  • d.jpg
    d.jpg
    36.2 KB · Views: 471
Physics news on Phys.org
When I solve your equations as you've given them I'm seeing -3/8 for the capacitance... which shouldn't be.

You have to be a bit careful about 'losing' solutions when you eliminate squares.
 
MissP.25_5 said:
Hello again. I hope someone could check if I got the answers correct.

The magnitude of the current I in resonant state was 3[A]. When the angular frequency of the power supply was 1 [rad/s] and 2[rad/s], the magnitude of current I became 1/√2 of the value when resonance occurred. Find R, L, C.

Your approach looks right, but I got a different result. Check your equations against mine & recheck your math:

(L - 1/C)^2 = 16,
(2L - 1/2C)^2 = 16
 
gneill said:
When I solve your equations as you've given them I'm seeing -3/8 for the capacitance... which shouldn't be.

You have to be a bit careful about 'losing' solutions when you eliminate squares.

Yes, at first I got -3/8 for the Capacitance but since it's an absolute value, I made it positive. Well, looks like I have to redo my calculation again :(
 
gneill said:
When I solve your equations as you've given them I'm seeing -3/8 for the capacitance... which shouldn't be.

You have to be a bit careful about 'losing' solutions when you eliminate squares.

I redid it and still got the same simultaneous equations. Can you tell me where I am wrong?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4391.jpg
    IMG_4391.jpg
    35.5 KB · Views: 489
MissP.25_5 said:
I redid it and still got the same simultaneous equations. Can you tell me where I am wrong?

Do you agree with my equations or not? If so, what solutions do you get?

Hint: there are multiple solutions but only one where L and C are positive, as they must be.
 
rude man said:
Do you agree with my equations or not? If so, what solutions do you get?

Hint: there are multiple solutions but only one where L and C are positive, as they must be.

Yes, yours seems to be the same as mine. But can we cancel out the squares by just adding a root to both sides?
 
MissP.25_5 said:
Yes, yours seems to be the same as mine. But can we cancel out the squares by just adding a root to both sides?

When you take a square root you have to realize there are two polarities involved. Here we are taking two roots so be prepared to get four sets of answers for L and C.

But only one of them has L > 0 and C > 0.
 
rude man said:
When you take a square root you have to realize there are two polarities involved. Here we are taking two roots so be prepared to get four sets of answers for L and C.

But only one of them has L > 0 and C > 0.

Oh, I totally forgot about that. So that's what "losing solutions" means. So C=1/8 and L=4.
Thank you soooo much! Could you take a look at my new thread? I need help.
 
MissP.25_5 said:
Oh, I totally forgot about that. So that's what "losing solutions" means. So C=1/8 and L=4.
Thank you soooo much! Could you take a look at my new thread? I need help.

Yes, you have got it!
Will check your new thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person