Finding Remainders for Large Numbers Modulo 5

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the remainder of the expression 1^99 + 2^99 + 3^99 + 4^99 + 5^99 when divided by 5. Participants explore modular arithmetic to compute the remainders for 2^99, 3^99, and 4^99, ultimately determining that the total remainder is 0. A generalization is proposed, suggesting that the sum of n integers, where n is prime, yields a remainder of 0 when divided by n, although this claim faces scrutiny for its generality. The conversation emphasizes the importance of specific examples in understanding modular relationships before applying broader conclusions. Overall, the thread highlights the application of modular arithmetic in solving problems involving large exponents.
cheiney
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) Find the remainder when 1^99 + 2^99 + 3^99 + 4^99 + 5^99 is divided by 5.
(b) Generalize this result

Homework Equations


Congruence Modulo

a\equivb mod n

also

a=n*q+b where q is some integer.

The Attempt at a Solution



The remainder for 1^99 would be 1.
The remainder for 5^99 would be 0.

I'm having difficulty finding the remainder for 2,3,4.

I'm assuming I have to use modular arithmetic to find the remainder for these, but I'm not sure where to start. Anyone care to point me in the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For ##2^{99}##, note that ##2^4 = 16## which leaves remainder ##1##. So start by using the division algorithm to write ##99 = 4a + b## where ##b < 4##.
 
cheiney said:
The remainder for 1^99 would be 5.

really ?
 
jbunill has offered you an idea, which is a good one. However if you are still not sure how to proceed, try this: compute each of ##2^n## mod 5 where n = 0,1,2, .. 7. Observe what happens. From that point you should be able to compute ##2^{99}## mod 5.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks everyone for your posts. I figured out the answer to both parts.

Part a) , the remainder is 0.

Part b) , If you sum n integers, where n is prime, and divide the sum by n, you will always get a remainder of 0.

P.S. Phinds and Mark44, I wrote it incorrectly. The remainder should be 1, not 5.

I especially appreciate brmath's post as this one made the most sense to me.
 
cheiney said:
Part b) , If you sum n integers, where n is prime, and divide the sum by n, you will always get a remainder of 0.

This is way too general... according to this claim, if I take 4 and 5, which is two integers, and I sum them, then divide by 2 I get a remainder of zero.
 
Office_Shredder said:
This is way too general... according to this claim, if I take 4 and 5, which is two integers, and I sum them, then divide by 2 I get a remainder of zero.

Ah, I didn't think of that. What if I specify n consecutive integers starting from 1?
 
Part (a) is not an example of that though... if it was

"Find 1+2+3+4+5 mod 5" then it would be, but as written it's not a sum of n consecutive integers.
 
  • #10
Office_Shredder said:
Part (a) is not an example of that though... if it was

"Find 1+2+3+4+5 mod 5" then it would be, but as written it's not a sum of n consecutive integers.

Okay I understand what you are saying. What if I said:

If you sum 1^a+2^a+3^a+...+n^a (where n is a prime number) and divide this sum by n, you end up with a remainder of 0?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
You can write 4 as -1 mod 5 and 3 as -2 mod 5.

( 1 mod5)^99 = (1 mod5)^98 *(1 mod5)
( -1 mod5)^99 = (-1 mod5)^98 *(-1 mod5),

the same with 2 mod5 and -2 mod5.

How are (k mod5)^98 and (-k mod5)^98 related?

ehild
 
  • #12
cheiney said:
Okay I understand what you are saying. What if I said:

If you sum 1^a+2^a+3^a+...+n^a (where n is a prime number) and divide this sum by n, you end up with a remainder of 0?

Is it true if a even? For example, 12+22+32 divided by 3?

ehild
 
  • #13
cheiney What is the connection between amod5 + bmod5 and (a+b)mod5? Figure that out by taking some examples.

Then figure out ##2^{99}, 3^{99}, 4^{99}## by the method I suggested earlier and use what you just learned about sums and mods.

It's best not to reach for general answers until you have worked out a number of specific cases.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K