Finding Surface Area of a Solid of Revolution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the surface area generated by rotating the curve defined by the equation y=5-4x^(3/2) over the interval 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 about the line x=2. Participants are discussing the integration process required to solve for the surface area using the formula SA = 2π∫(r·ds)dx.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring different methods for integrating the surface area formula, including substitution techniques. Some express confusion about the integration process and the correct limits of integration. Others question the setup of the integral and the implications of omitting certain variables.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of substitution methods and integration techniques. Some participants have provided suggestions for simplifying the integral, while others are clarifying the correct setup and limits. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to navigate the complexities of the problem without reaching a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that they have not yet covered certain integration techniques, such as Integration By Parts, which may limit their approaches. There is also mention of a potential mistake in the limits of integration and the need for careful attention to the variables used in substitutions.

BraedenP
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the surface area generated by rotating [itex]y=5-4x^(3/2), 0\leq x\leq 1[/itex] about x=2.

Homework Equations



[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{a}^{b}(r\cdot ds)dx[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply filled in the formula for the given question, and I'm getting stuck at integration time.

[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}(2-x)\cdot \sqrt{1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}5-4x^{3/2})\right)^2}[/tex]

Simplified, it's:

[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}(2-x)\cdot \sqrt{1+36x}[/tex]

We haven't done Integration By Parts yet, so I can't "deal with" the multiplication. What I tried to do was square the (2-x) to get [itex]x^2-4x+4[/itex] and then combined the roots:

[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}\sqrt{36x^3-143x^2+140x+4}[/tex]

But that still isn't a manageable integral, given that I can't use substitution or anything.

How would I go about solving this question?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex] SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}(2-x)\cdot \sqrt{1+36x}[/tex]


Try something simpler like a substitution of t=1+36x (remember, you can always rewrite x in terms of t :wink:)
 
Just to keep the account books straight, this integral
[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{a}^{b}(r\cdot ds)dx[/tex]

should be
[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{a}^{b}r\cdot ds[/tex]

Multiplying by dx/dx gives
[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{a}^{b}r\cdot ds/dx~dx[/tex]

Using your function, we get
[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{2}(2-x)\cdot \sqrt{1+36x}dx[/tex]


Notice the change in the upper limit of integration.
 
Gah, I always write the question wrong on here for some reason. I should have written [itex]0 \leq x \leq 1[/itex] above. (Changed now for clarity)

Basically, I'm fine getting that formula, but I get stuck when trying to integrate it. It's not in a format that I'm used to working with.
 
I would go with rockfreak's suggested substitution.
 
Hmm, not quite sure why I can't get this question... Here's my attempt with the substitution:

[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}(2-\frac{1}{36}(t-1))\cdot \sqrt{t}[/tex]

Expand everything:

[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}2\sqrt{t}-\frac{1}{36}(t^{\frac{3}{2}}-\sqrt{t})[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]SA = \frac{\pi}{18}\int_{0}^{1}72t^\frac{1}{2}-t^\frac{3}{2}+t^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

And I get (we don't need to find a decimal answer -- integrating it to this form should be enough:

[tex]SA = \frac{\pi}{18}\left[ 48t^\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{5}t^\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{3}t^\frac{3}{2} \right ][/tex] from t=1 to t=37

I don't think this is right though...
 
You keep omitting the dx or dt. That's the reason for a mistake you make right near the beginning. Your substitution was t = 1 + 36x, so dt = 36dx.

Also, when you are integrating, it's almost always better to write radical expressions using exponents.

BraedenP said:
Hmm, not quite sure why I can't get this question... Here's my attempt with the substitution:

[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}(2-\frac{1}{36}(t-1))\cdot \sqrt{t}[/tex]

Expand everything:

[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}2\sqrt{t}-\frac{1}{36}(t^{\frac{3}{2}}-\sqrt{t})[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]SA = \frac{\pi}{18}\int_{0}^{1}72t^\frac{1}{2}-t^\frac{3}{2}+t^\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

And I get (we don't need to find a decimal answer -- integrating it to this form should be enough:

[tex]SA = \frac{\pi}{18}\left[ 48t^\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{5}t^\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{3}t^\frac{3}{2} \right ][/tex] from t=1 to t=37

I don't think this is right though...
 
Hmm, thanks.. Not sure why I omitted it. I did keep in mind while answering the question, however, which variable I was integrating with respect to.

Did my omission cause a mistake in the final answer, or were you just pointing out that I forgot to write it?
 
Last edited:
It caused a mistake.
[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}(2-x)\cdot \sqrt{1+36x}dx[/tex]

Let u = 1 + 36x, so du = 36dx, and x = (1/36)(u - 1). (I'm more used to using u for substitutions.)

With the substitutions, we have
[tex]SA = \pi/18 \int_{u = 1}^{37} [2 - (1/36)(u - 1)]u^{1/2}du[/tex]
[tex]= \pi/18 \int_{u = 1}^{37} [2u^{1/2} - (1/36)u^{3/2} + (1/36)u^{1/2}]du[/tex]

By omitting dx, you neglected a factor of 1/36 with du (since dx = (1/36)du).
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
It caused a mistake.
[tex]SA = 2\pi\int_{0}^{1}(2-x)\cdot \sqrt{1+36x}dx[/tex]

Let u = 1 + 36x, so du = 36dx, and x = (1/36)(u - 1). (I'm more used to using u for substitutions.)

With the substitutions, we have
[tex]SA = \pi/18 \int_{u = 1}^{37} [2 - (1/36)(u - 1)]u^{1/2}du[/tex]
[tex]= \pi/18 \int_{u = 1}^{37} [2u^{1/2} - (1/36)u^{3/2} + (1/36)u^{1/2}]du[/tex]

By omitting dx, you neglected a factor of 1/36 with du (since dx = (1/36)du).

I got x= (1/36)(u-1) but then I tried to factor out the (1/36) to make integration simpler, and that seems to be where I messed up. I'll just continue without trying to factor it out.

Thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K