Finding the amplitude of a vertical spring

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem related to the amplitude of a vertical spring involving a mass of lemons and a spring constant. The user successfully derived equations for the velocity of the lemons after being dropped and the elongation of the spring at equilibrium. However, they struggle with part d, where they attempt to apply the conservation of energy equation but are unsure about their definitions of mass and displacement. Clarification is provided that the potential energy of the spring must be calculated from its relaxed length. The user seeks confirmation on their approach and whether their calculations are correct.
dnglified1
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Please see attached file
Relevant Equations
Et = Et'
GPE = mgh
SPE = 1/2kx^2
KE = 1/2mv^2
The question asks for a bunch of stuff, but I have everything except part d down.
a) Setting the mass of lemons as m1, I used m1*gh = 1/2mv^2, solving for v of the lemons as v = √2gh, where h is the height at which it is dropped. Then, I used COM and had this equation (not 100% sure if right):
m1*√2gh = (m1 + mp)*vf, and isolated for vf = (m1*√2gh)/(m1 + mp)

b) Setting the equilibrium point at zero, I used kx = mp*g to get x = 0.0054 meters of elongation.

c) Setting Fnet as 0, I used kx = m1*g to get x = m1*g/k

d) This is what I have for the COE equation:

1/2(m1 + mp)vf^2 + mgx = 1/2kx^2

My reasoning for this is that the total energy stored in the spring at max displacement should be equal to the initial kinetic energy of the whole system plus the GPE the spring has due to it not being completely compressed. I solved for x and since x = 2A, A = 0.5x. But I am not getting the expression that is expected. I don't know if the entire thing is wrong or if it is just a math issue.
 

Attachments

  • question.JPG
    question.JPG
    80.4 KB · Views: 528
Physics news on Phys.org
Apologies for formatting, it's my first non-introductory post :)
 
dnglified1 said:
1/2(m1 + mp)vf^2 + mgx = 1/2kx^2
How are you defining m and x there?
Remember that, for the spring PE to be 1/2kx^2, x must be the displacement from the spring's relaxed length.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K