Finding the analytic expression for arcsinh

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Given that ##\sinh x = \frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{2}##, find an expression for ##arcsinh x##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


We can proceed by the normal procedure for finding inverses of well-defined functions, solve ##x = \frac{e^y - e^{-y}}{2}## for y. After doing some algebra and using the quadratic formula, we find that ##y = \log (x \pm \sqrt{x^2 + 1})##. How do I know which root to take? It would seem that there are two inverse functions of sinhx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


Given that ##\sinh x = \frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{2}##, find an expression for ##arcsinh x##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


We can proceed by the normal procedure for finding inverses of well-defined functions, solve ##x = \frac{e^y - e^{-y}}{2}## for y. After doing some algebra and using the quadratic formula, we find that ##y = \log (x \pm \sqrt{x^2 + 1})##. How do I know which root to take? It would seem that there are two inverse functions of sinhx
What is the argument of the logarithm if you take the negative sign in ##y = \log (x \pm \sqrt{x^2 + 1})##?
 
So since ##e^y## is always positive, and ##x - \sqrt{x^2 + 1}## is negative for all x, do we consider it an extraneous "solution", and thus take the other root? Why does ##x - \sqrt{x^2 + 1}## show up if it can't actually be a solution?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
So since ##e^y## is always positive, and ##x - \sqrt{x^2 + 1}## is negative for all x, do we consider it an extraneous "solution", and thus take the other root? Why does ##x - \sqrt{x^2 + 1}## show up if it can't actually be a solution?
If you had ##u^2 - 2yu - 1 = 0## and your goal was to solve for u, you would get ##u = y \pm \sqrt{y^2 + 1}##. Here there is no problem with u being negative.

However, in your equation, you have ##e^{2x} - 2ye^x - 1 = 0##. Solving for ##e^x## gives the same solution as for u, above. This time around, ##e^x## must be nonnegative, so we have to discard the solution ##y - \sqrt{y^2 + 1}##. You weren't solving an actual quadratic equation -- instead, you were solving one that was only quadratic in form. Since ##u = e^x##, u can only take on nonnegative values.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97
Mr Davis 97 said:
Why does ##x - \sqrt{x^2 + 1}## show up if it can't actually be a solution?

Because our beloved algebraic manipulations are not completely reliable. We do them without keeping track of the assumptions we use when we apply them.

To repeat what Mark44 said:

From ## 2x = e^y + \frac{1}{e^y} ## we can multiply both sides by ##e^y## provided we assume ##e^y## is a number. From the properties of the function ##e^y##, we must assume ##e^y## is a positive number.

Later where our work leads to the conclusion: ## e^y = x + \sqrt{x^2 + 1} ## or ## e^y = x - \sqrt{x^2 + 1}## this work takes place under the assumption ##e^y > 0##. So if we were using the appropriate words to keep track of our assumptions, we would see the alternative ##e^y = x - \sqrt{x^2 + 1}## is not viable.

It's similar to evaluating an expression in proposition logic like ## A \land (B \lor \lnot A)## to imply ## A \land B##. When we do the algebraic manipulations we forget the "##A \land##" prefixes the work that leads to ##(B \lor \lnot A)## and then we wonder why the alternative ## \lnot A## doesn't work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 587159