Finding the Ɛ and r of a cell from a graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter shafi25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Graph
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the electromotive force (Ɛ) and internal resistance (r) of a dry cell using both graphical and quick methods. The quick method yielded Ɛ=1.490 V and r=0.2194 Ω, while the graphical method produced Ɛ=1.494 V and an incorrect negative resistance of -5.4 Ω. The participants emphasized the importance of correctly applying the slope from the linear equation y=mx+c to the equation V=-Ir+Ɛ to avoid nonsensical results. The comparison of values from both methods is crucial for understanding measurement uncertainties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and its application in circuit analysis
  • Familiarity with linear equations and graphing techniques
  • Knowledge of electromotive force (Ɛ) and internal resistance (r) concepts
  • Experience with experimental data collection and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate uncertainties in experimental measurements
  • Study the relationship between slope and resistance in linear equations
  • Explore advanced graphing techniques using software tools like Excel or MATLAB
  • Investigate the principles of circuit theory related to internal resistance and emf
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrical circuits and experimental methods for measuring electromotive force and internal resistance.

shafi25
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It is an experiment. Finding the internal resistance of a Dry cell. It includes 2 methods, the quick method and the graphical method. Work out and record 8 pairs of V and I reading by varying the slider of the rheostat and then work out the Ɛ (e.m.f) and r (internal resistance) by creating a graph. Then compare these (Ɛ and r) values with the values obtained from the quick method.

Homework Equations


m=∆y/∆x (m=change in y/change in x=(y1-y)/(x1-x))
y=mx+c
V=-Ir+Ɛ

The Attempt at a Solution


I've done the quick method. The obtained values of Ɛ and r from the quick method are Ɛ=1.490 v and r= 0.2194 Ω. And now now I'm stuck here. I have recorded 8 pairs of reading in the result table. And tried to do the graph, but the result is showing some weird figures. I probably am doing it wrong. Also, I'm quite confused with the equation "y=mx+c", I figured this equation is connected with (somehow) V=-rI+Ɛ, but not really sure how to apply them!
Here is the graph I was trying to work out. hope that helps.

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/0d89095d56.jpg

And here is the calculetion:

So, m= ∆y/∆x
m= (y1-y)/(x1-x)
m= (1.197-1.359)/ (0.055-0.025)= (-0.162)/0.030
= -5.4
And the equation of a straight line is y=mx+c
So, 1.359= {(-5.4)*(0.025)} +c [since y=1.359, x=1.197 and m= -5.4]
=>1.359= (-0.135) +c
=>c= 1.359+ 0.135
=>c= 1.494
By rearranging the equation of the straight line,
y= mx+c
V= -Ir+ Ɛ
So, Ɛ= 1.494 v and the internal resistance of the dry cell r= negative 5.4 Ω
Comparing with the quick method, Ɛ=1.490 v and r= 0.2194Ω (Is that even close?, the values from graphical method! )

I've marked RED for those areas that I'm unsure!

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
.
Welcome to Physics Forums!

shafi25 said:
. . . here is the calculetion:

So, m= ∆y/∆x
m= (y1-y)/(x1-x)
m= (1.197-1.359)/ (0.055-0.025)= (-0.162)/0.030
= -5.4
Good enough, since the data points all lie very close to a straight line. And you wisely chose the 2 points farthest apart, which minimizes the error in the calculation.

And the equation of a straight line is y=mx+c
So, 1.359= {(-5.4)*(0.025)} +c [since y=1.359, x=1.197 and m= -5.4]
Yes (though you really meant to say x=0.025)
=>1.359= (-0.135) +c
=>c= 1.359+ 0.135
=>c= 1.494
By rearranging the equation of the straight line,
y= mx+c
V= -Ir+ Ɛ
So, Ɛ= 1.494 v and the internal resistance of the dry cell r= negative 5.4 Ω
Correct for Ɛ. However, getting a negative resistance does not make physical sense in this case.
Note the following:
m is the slope in "y=mx+c"
-r is the slope in "V = -Ir + Ɛ​
Equate -r with the value you got for m, and see what you get.
Comparing with the quick method, Ɛ=1.490 v and r= 0.2194Ω (Is that even close?, the values from graphical method! )
I don't know what the quick method is, so I can't really comment on it. What is your opinion about comparing the values for the two methods?
 
Thank you for your reply. yeah, I should have demonstrated the method 1 or as mentioned "quick method". the comparing was actually for the sake of calculating uncertainties, but that's ok. although I am a little confused how to work out uncertainties from a set of values, but I'm working on it. :) and yeah, I found out I could've work out the emf and the r from the graph without even calculating. Thank you.

Shafi
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
4K