Finding the capcitance of this capacitator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a capacitor (C1) filled with a dielectric material whose permittivity changes linearly from ε1 to ε2. The correct formula for the total capacitance is established as 1/Cp = [d ln(ε2/ε1)] / [ε0 (ε2-ε1) A], while the original poster's calculations led to an incorrect factor of d. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the integral for the capacitance and ensuring consistent units throughout the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor theory and capacitance calculations
  • Familiarity with dielectric materials and their permittivity (ε)
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly in the context of physics
  • Ability to analyze and manipulate mathematical expressions involving units
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance formulas for capacitors with varying dielectric properties
  • Learn about the application of integrals in calculating capacitance in series configurations
  • Explore the implications of unit consistency in physics equations
  • Investigate the behavior of dielectric materials under varying electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists, and anyone involved in capacitor design or analysis, particularly those working with variable dielectric materials.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
given the capacitator C1 filled with dialectric subtances, which change linearly from ε1 to ε2, what is the capacitance of C1?

since i know that ε changes linerly, according to the distance between the plates, and i know that at x=0 ε=ε1 and x=d ε=ε2

εr=ax+b
εr1=a*0+b
b=ε1
εr2=a*d+ε1
a=(ε21)/d

εr=(ε21)x/d+ε1
εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d

know this capacitator C1 is like millions of tiny little capacitators, dC, each with dialectric substance changing like εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d, all connected in a column,

1/Cp=\intd/(Aε0εr)d(εr) from (ε1 to ε2)

=d/(Aε0)\intd(d/((ε21)x+ε1d))

=d2/(Aε0)\intdx/((ε21)x+ε1d) (from 0 to d)

=d2/(Aε0)*1/(ε21)* ln((ε21)x+ε1d)|from 0 to d

=[d2ln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0


but the correct answer is meant to be 1/Cp=[dln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0

can anyone see whre i went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dell said:
given the capacitator C1 filled with dialectric subtances, which change linearly from ε1 to ε2, what is the capacitance of C1?

since i know that ε changes linerly, according to the distance between the plates, and i know that at x=0 ε=ε1 and x=d ε=ε2

εr=ax+b
εr1=a*0+b
b=ε1
εr2=a*d+ε1
a=(ε21)/d

εr=(ε21)x/d+ε1
εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d

know this capacitator C1 is like millions of tiny little capacitators, dC, each with dialectric substance changing like εr=((ε21)x+ε1d)/d, all connected in a column,

1/Cp=∫d/(Aε0εr)d(εr) from (ε1 to ε2)

=d/(Aε0)∫d(d/((ε21)x+ε1d))

While I don't exactly follow what you are doing, it appears that your extra factor of d first appears here.

Just as a general rule, I wouldn't name a variable d if integration will be involved in solving the problem. Too easy to lose track of which is the variable d, and which is used to denote the variable of integration.

=d2/(Aε0)∫dx/((ε21)x+ε1d) (from 0 to d)

=d2/(Aε0)*1/(ε21)* ln((ε21)x+ε1d)|from 0 to d

=[d2ln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0


but the correct answer is meant to be 1/Cp=[dln(ε21)]/ε021)Aε0

can anyone see whre i went wrong?
 
thats exactly right, the problem comes from the fact that i already have one 'd' and my εr is also dependent on 'd' εr=((ε2-ε1)x+ε1d)/d and that's where the second factor comes from, but i cannot see why this should be incorrect mathematically.
 
I would have set up the integral differently to begin with. What is 1/C for a slab of thickness dx? (d→differential, not capacitor thickness here) Then add them by doing the appropriate integral, as you are aware. It's not clear to me how you got the first integral you wrote.

p.s. there is a problem with the "correct" answer you quoted,

1/Cp=[d ln(ε21)] / [ε021) A ε0],​

because the units are inconsistent.
 
and the units of my answer??
 
It would be beneficial for you to work that out. They should come out to be 1/F.
 
I'll offer this hint:

The quantity d / (A ε0) has the correct units of 1/Farads. So any remaining terms should, overall, be unitless.
 
d / (A ε0) = 1/F

d2ln(ε2/ε1)]/(ε2-ε1)Aε0=d/(A ε0)* (d*ln(ε2/ε1)/(ε2/ε1))

what would the units of (d*ln(ε2/ε1)/(ε2/ε1)) be
 
The ε's are all unitless, leaving ... ?
 
  • #10
so i get m/F,

but you said that there was a problem with the "correct " answers units, as far as i see they come to 1/F

1/Cp=[dln(ε2/ε1)]/(ε2-ε1)Aε0

i just saw that i wrote
1/Cp=[dln(ε2/ε1)]/ε0(ε2-ε1)Aε0
and there is an extra ε0, but you said that they are unitless
 
  • #11
e0 does have units, e1 and e2 do not.

So, the "correct" answer has the correct units afterall.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
so how would you have solved it?
the capacitance you spoke of would be

1/C=dx/(ε0εrA)
=dx/(ε0((ε2-ε1)x+ε1D)/D)A)

i used D for the distance

= D/(ε0A)∫dx/((ε21)x+ε1D)
=D/(ε0A(ε21)) * [ln(ε21)]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if i would not have taken 1/C but instead C, why would i not reach the correct answer,
 
  • #13
The slabs of thickness dx act as many capacitors in series.

For capacitors in series, we add the reciprocals of capacitance to get total capacitance.
 
  • #14
Dell said:
so how would you have solved it?
Oh, I forgot to say in my last post ... I would do exactly what you did here:
the capacitance you spoke of would be

1/C=dx/(ε0εrA)
=dx/(ε0((ε2-ε1)x+ε1D)/D)A)

i used D for the distance

= D/(ε0A)∫dx/((ε21)x+ε1D)
=D/(ε0A(ε21)) * [ln(ε21)]
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K