Finding the coefficient of kinetic friction and work

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction and the work done by friction on a 2.00-kg package sliding down a quarter-circle track and then on a horizontal surface. The package reaches a speed of 4.80 m/s at point B and slides 3.00 m to point C, where it comes to rest. The normal force (N) was calculated as 19.6 N, and the frictional force (fK) was derived using the relationship fK = coefficient of friction x N. The coefficient of friction was estimated to be 0.031, although participants questioned its validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of kinetic friction and its calculation
  • Familiarity with basic physics equations, including work-energy principles
  • Ability to analyze motion in two dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the work-energy theorem in physics
  • Learn how to calculate kinetic friction using fK = μN
  • Explore the relationship between acceleration, distance, and time in motion problems
  • Investigate the effects of different surfaces on the coefficient of friction
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of friction and motion analysis.

leafeater47
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a truck loading station at a post office, a small 2.00-kg package is released from rest at point A on a track that is one-quarter of a circle with radius 1.60 m. The size of the package is much less than 1.60 m, so the package can be treated as a particle. It slides down the track and reaches point B with a speed of 4.80 m/s. From point B, it slides on a level surface a distance of 3.00 m to point C, where it comes to rest.

a) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction on the horizontal surface?

b) How much work is done on the package by friction as it slide down the circular arc from A to B?Normally, I would follow the guidelines and post equations and attempts at this problem but the thing is, I have no idea what equations I'm supposed to use, and that's a bit of a problem.

*EDIT* Equations: Fy = -mgy + N
I plugged everything in, getting 0 = -(2)(9.8)(cos0) + N and N=19.6. Is this right? What do I do from here, if it is right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi leafeater47,

leafeater47 said:
In a truck loading station at a post office, a small 2.00-kg package is released from rest at point A on a track that is one-quarter of a circle with radius 1.60 m. The size of the package is much less than 1.60 m, so the package can be treated as a particle. It slides down the track and reaches point B with a speed of 4.80 m/s. From point B, it slides on a level surface a distance of 3.00 m to point C, where it comes to rest.

a) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction on the horizontal surface?

b) How much work is done on the package by friction as it slide down the circular arc from A to B?


Normally, I would follow the guidelines and post equations and attempts at this problem but the thing is, I have no idea what equations I'm supposed to use, and that's a bit of a problem.

*EDIT* Equations: Fy = -mgy + N
I plugged everything in, getting 0 = -(2)(9.8)(cos0) + N and N=19.6. Is this right? What do I do from here, if it is right?

That looks like the right value for the normal force (for the horizontal surface). How is the normal force related to the kinetic frictional force?

The effect of friction is to bring the object to rest in a distance of 3m (starting at 4.8m/s). What can you find from those values, that will relate to the frictional force?
 
So, I should use fK = coeff. of friction x N?
To get fK, do I do 4.8m/s x 3m x .2kg? That doesn't seem right...

OR, when you said what can i find from the values 4.8m/s and 3m, did you mean find the time for how long it takes the block to stop sliding? If that's what you meant I got .625s.

And if that's the case, then to get fK i would do (4.8m/s)(.2kg)(.625s) and get .6 and when I plug that into the equation above, I get coeff. of friction = .031.

Is any of this right or am I just completely spouting nonsense? I don't think I did anything right lol I think the coeff. of friction is supposed to be bigger.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K