Finding the complex function given a real component

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a complex function f(z) given its real component u(x,y) = x/(x^2+y^2). Participants are exploring the use of Cauchy-Riemann equations to derive the imaginary component v(x,y) and ultimately the full complex function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the Cauchy-Riemann equations to find the derivatives u_x and u_y, and subsequently integrate to find v. There are discussions about potential integration errors and the implications of constants of integration A(x) and B(y). Some participants are also considering alternative methods like the Milne-Thomson method for constructing complex functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their integration steps and the roles of the integration constants. Others have noted potential algebra mistakes and are revisiting their calculations. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of needing to find the complex function analytically, and there is mention of a provided answer in the textbook that seems simpler than their current approaches. The discussion includes references to specific integration techniques and the need to reconcile different forms of v.

TheFerruccio
Messages
216
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find [tex]f(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y)[/tex] with u or v as a given.

Homework Equations



[tex]u = \frac{x}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, if the function is analytic, then [tex]u_x = v_y[/tex] and [tex]u_y = -v_x[/tex]

So, the first thing I did was find the x derivative of u.

[tex]u_x = \frac{y^2-x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}[/tex] which equals [tex]v_y[/tex]

Then, I integrated in terms of y to get [tex]\frac{1}{x}\arctan{\frac{y}{x}} + A(x)[/tex]

However, it seems that I might be going about this the wrong way, as the problem is getting rather hairy from here. The answer the book provides is much simpler than where this seems to be going.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the right approach but I think you may have integrated incorrectly.
 
It might be more obvious how to integrate the other Cauchy-Riemann equation, u_y=(-v_x). Try that.
 
I approached the problem from the other direction, and I am still ending up at an impasse. I am not entirely sure what to do with the A(y) function that results from the integration.

I'm getting:

[tex]v = \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} + A(y)[/tex]

I am also getting
[tex]u_x = \frac{1}{x^2+y^2} - \frac{2x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}[/tex]

Integrating with respect to y...
[tex]v = \frac{-y}{x^2+y^2} + B(x)[/tex]

I get the following equality, after some rearranging:

[tex]B(x)-A(y) = \frac{2y}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]

I am not entirely sure where to go from here, especially with regards to the A(x) and B(y), but the final complex function that the book was able to rearrange into was f(z) = 1/z.

So, I am still very much stuck as to how to continue.
 
It looks to me like you got v=(-y)/(x^2+y^2). If so there's no need to continue, you are done, v and u satisfy the CR equations. And they are the real and complex parts of 1/z.
 
You could use the Milne-Thomson method to construct complex functions...

Complex Functions.jpg


Note : Pardon the handwriting in the image. C is the integration constant. Also, if you've been given the imaginary part of the complex function, you can use f ' (z) = v1(z , 0) + i v2(z , 0).
 
Last edited:
I should follow up on this. I still have the information regarding the Milne-Thomson method up, and am reading through it.

I realized that I had encountered an algebra mistake when I was doing the integration. I was able to figure it out, and I found out how the A(x) and B(y) functions disappeared just by comparing the two different forms of v.
 
A good way to find the expression for the function in terms of [itex]z[/itex] is to use analytic continuation : The function on the real line must agree with the complex function. So just set y=0, and in the result replace all the x's with z's.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K