Finding the conduction current density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The conduction current density in intrinsic germanium is defined by the equation J_e = (nμ_n + pμ_p)qE, where σ represents conductivity. Given the resistivity of intrinsic germanium at 60 Ohm-cm, the equation simplifies to J_i = n_i(μ_n + μ_p)qE. The discussion highlights the challenge of solving for three unknowns: μ_n, μ_p, and J_e, with only two equations available. It emphasizes the need for additional information, specifically the mobilities of electrons (3800 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹) and holes (1800 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹), to proceed with calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor physics
  • Familiarity with charge neutrality equations
  • Knowledge of the Mass Action Law
  • Basic proficiency in solving algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of temperature on semiconductor mobility values
  • Study the effects of doping concentrations on carrier densities in semiconductors
  • Learn about the complete ionization assumption in semiconductor physics
  • Explore the derivation and application of the conductivity equation in semiconductor materials
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, semiconductor physicists, and anyone involved in the analysis and design of semiconductor devices.

PhysicsTest
Messages
256
Reaction score
27
Homework Statement
A sample of germanium is doped to the extent of 10^14 donor atoms/cm^3 and 7*10^13 acceptor atoms/cm^3. At the temperature of the sample the resistivity of pure (intrinsic) germanium is 60 Ohm-cm. If the applied electric field is 2V/cm, find the total conduction current density.
Relevant Equations
##J = (n\mu_n + p\mu_p)qE ##
The current density is given by the formula
##J_e = (n\mu_n + p\mu_p)qE = \sigma E; \sigma \text{=conductivity}## ->eq1
The resistivity of intrinsic germanium is 60 Ohm-cm, the equation 1 becomes
##J_i=n_i(\mu_n + \mu_p)qE## ->eq2
##J_i=60 \text{ ohm-cm} ##
Applying the standard equations of charge neutrality
##N_D + p = N_A + n ## ->eq3
##N_D - \text{ number of Donor atoms} = 10^{14}##
##N_A - \text{ number of Acceptor atoms} = 7*10^{13} ##
##p - \text{ number of holes} ##
##n - \text{ number of electrons} ##
Using Mass Action law
##np = n_i^2## ->eq4
From eq3, 4 i can calculate ##n## and ##p##, but not sure how to proceed further? I feel three unknowns to be solved ##\mu_n, \mu_p,J_e## only 2 equations eq1, eq2 are available. How to solve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
I feel three unknowns to be solved ##\mu_n, \mu_p,J_e## only 2 equations eq1, eq2 are available. How to solve?
I suspect the question is incomplete and you should also be given the values of electron and hole mobilities: 3800 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹ and 1800cm²⁻¹s⁻¹ respectively.

I’ve seen this question before and it included the mobility values. See Q8 here: https://www.meritnation.com/ask-ans...s-materials-devices-and-simple-circu/10985139
 
  • Like
Likes PhysicsTest
I am not sure if the question in the link is correct, because if you see
1609942429869.png

The above are the standard values at 300K as per the book. But in the actual question it does not mention the exact temperature, it only says at the temperature of the sample.
 
PhysicsTest said:
I am not sure if the question in the link is correct, because if you see
View attachment 275754
The above are the standard values at 300K as per the book. But in the actual question it does not mention the exact temperature, it only says at the temperature of the sample.
I can’t suggest anything else.

However, I will note this. You have both donor and acceptor atoms added. It is not clear to me what will happen. I suspect they will partially ‘cancel out’, the net effect being the same as simply adding (10¹⁴ - 7x10¹³ =) 3x10¹³ donor atoms/cm³.

EDIT: The above is supported by the statement from https://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee105/fa05/handouts/discussions/Discussion1.pdf
“If we assume complete ionization and if Nd-Na >> ni, the majority carrier electron concentration is, to a very good approximation, just the difference between the donor and acceptor concentrations”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PhysicsTest

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K