Finding the conduction current density

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
PhysicsTest
Messages
260
Reaction score
27
Homework Statement
A sample of germanium is doped to the extent of 10^14 donor atoms/cm^3 and 7*10^13 acceptor atoms/cm^3. At the temperature of the sample the resistivity of pure (intrinsic) germanium is 60 Ohm-cm. If the applied electric field is 2V/cm, find the total conduction current density.
Relevant Equations
##J = (n\mu_n + p\mu_p)qE ##
The current density is given by the formula
##J_e = (n\mu_n + p\mu_p)qE = \sigma E; \sigma \text{=conductivity}## ->eq1
The resistivity of intrinsic germanium is 60 Ohm-cm, the equation 1 becomes
##J_i=n_i(\mu_n + \mu_p)qE## ->eq2
##J_i=60 \text{ ohm-cm} ##
Applying the standard equations of charge neutrality
##N_D + p = N_A + n ## ->eq3
##N_D - \text{ number of Donor atoms} = 10^{14}##
##N_A - \text{ number of Acceptor atoms} = 7*10^{13} ##
##p - \text{ number of holes} ##
##n - \text{ number of electrons} ##
Using Mass Action law
##np = n_i^2## ->eq4
From eq3, 4 i can calculate ##n## and ##p##, but not sure how to proceed further? I feel three unknowns to be solved ##\mu_n, \mu_p,J_e## only 2 equations eq1, eq2 are available. How to solve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
I feel three unknowns to be solved ##\mu_n, \mu_p,J_e## only 2 equations eq1, eq2 are available. How to solve?
I suspect the question is incomplete and you should also be given the values of electron and hole mobilities: 3800 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹ and 1800cm²⁻¹s⁻¹ respectively.

I’ve seen this question before and it included the mobility values. See Q8 here: https://www.meritnation.com/ask-ans...s-materials-devices-and-simple-circu/10985139
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest
I am not sure if the question in the link is correct, because if you see
1609942429869.png

The above are the standard values at 300K as per the book. But in the actual question it does not mention the exact temperature, it only says at the temperature of the sample.
 
PhysicsTest said:
I am not sure if the question in the link is correct, because if you see
View attachment 275754
The above are the standard values at 300K as per the book. But in the actual question it does not mention the exact temperature, it only says at the temperature of the sample.
I can’t suggest anything else.

However, I will note this. You have both donor and acceptor atoms added. It is not clear to me what will happen. I suspect they will partially ‘cancel out’, the net effect being the same as simply adding (10¹⁴ - 7x10¹³ =) 3x10¹³ donor atoms/cm³.

EDIT: The above is supported by the statement from https://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee105/fa05/handouts/discussions/Discussion1.pdf
“If we assume complete ionization and if Nd-Na >> ni, the majority carrier electron concentration is, to a very good approximation, just the difference between the donor and acceptor concentrations”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest