Finding the conduction current density

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the conduction current density in intrinsic germanium, utilizing equations related to charge neutrality and mass action law. The problem involves calculating the current density while considering the effects of donor and acceptor atoms on charge carrier concentrations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationships between charge carrier concentrations and mobilities, questioning the completeness of the problem due to missing values for mobilities. There is also a discussion on the implications of donor and acceptor concentrations and their potential cancellation effect.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising concerns about the adequacy of the provided information and exploring the implications of the assumptions made regarding temperature and mobility values. Some guidance is offered regarding the interpretation of donor and acceptor concentrations, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific temperature information in the problem statement, which may affect the applicability of standard mobility values. There is also mention of the need for additional data to fully resolve the unknowns in the equations presented.

PhysicsTest
Messages
260
Reaction score
27
Homework Statement
A sample of germanium is doped to the extent of 10^14 donor atoms/cm^3 and 7*10^13 acceptor atoms/cm^3. At the temperature of the sample the resistivity of pure (intrinsic) germanium is 60 Ohm-cm. If the applied electric field is 2V/cm, find the total conduction current density.
Relevant Equations
##J = (n\mu_n + p\mu_p)qE ##
The current density is given by the formula
##J_e = (n\mu_n + p\mu_p)qE = \sigma E; \sigma \text{=conductivity}## ->eq1
The resistivity of intrinsic germanium is 60 Ohm-cm, the equation 1 becomes
##J_i=n_i(\mu_n + \mu_p)qE## ->eq2
##J_i=60 \text{ ohm-cm} ##
Applying the standard equations of charge neutrality
##N_D + p = N_A + n ## ->eq3
##N_D - \text{ number of Donor atoms} = 10^{14}##
##N_A - \text{ number of Acceptor atoms} = 7*10^{13} ##
##p - \text{ number of holes} ##
##n - \text{ number of electrons} ##
Using Mass Action law
##np = n_i^2## ->eq4
From eq3, 4 i can calculate ##n## and ##p##, but not sure how to proceed further? I feel three unknowns to be solved ##\mu_n, \mu_p,J_e## only 2 equations eq1, eq2 are available. How to solve?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsTest said:
I feel three unknowns to be solved ##\mu_n, \mu_p,J_e## only 2 equations eq1, eq2 are available. How to solve?
I suspect the question is incomplete and you should also be given the values of electron and hole mobilities: 3800 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹ and 1800cm²⁻¹s⁻¹ respectively.

I’ve seen this question before and it included the mobility values. See Q8 here: https://www.meritnation.com/ask-ans...s-materials-devices-and-simple-circu/10985139
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest
I am not sure if the question in the link is correct, because if you see
1609942429869.png

The above are the standard values at 300K as per the book. But in the actual question it does not mention the exact temperature, it only says at the temperature of the sample.
 
PhysicsTest said:
I am not sure if the question in the link is correct, because if you see
View attachment 275754
The above are the standard values at 300K as per the book. But in the actual question it does not mention the exact temperature, it only says at the temperature of the sample.
I can’t suggest anything else.

However, I will note this. You have both donor and acceptor atoms added. It is not clear to me what will happen. I suspect they will partially ‘cancel out’, the net effect being the same as simply adding (10¹⁴ - 7x10¹³ =) 3x10¹³ donor atoms/cm³.

EDIT: The above is supported by the statement from https://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ee105/fa05/handouts/discussions/Discussion1.pdf
“If we assume complete ionization and if Nd-Na >> ni, the majority carrier electron concentration is, to a very good approximation, just the difference between the donor and acceptor concentrations”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsTest

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K