Finding the de Broglie wavelength from momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the de Broglie wavelength of a neutron with a momentum of 300 MeV/c. The correct formula for the wavelength is λ = h/p, where p is the momentum. Participants clarify that MeV/c is already a momentum unit, negating the need to divide by the speed of light. There is confusion regarding the conversion of MeV to SI units, with some participants mistakenly thinking they need to adjust for the speed of light. Ultimately, the consensus is that the initial calculations for momentum were correct, and the given answer for the wavelength appears to be inaccurate.
Matty R
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the de Broglie wavelength of a neutron traveling with a momentum equal to 300 \frac{\text{MeV}}{\text{c}}?


Homework Equations



\lambda = \frac{h}{p}

The Attempt at a Solution



p = \frac{300 \cdot \left( \left(1\times10^6 \right) \times \left(1.602\times10^{-19} \right) \right)}{2.998\times10^8}

= 1.603\times10^{-19} \text{ kgms}^{-1}

\lamda = \frac{6.626\times10^{-34}}{1.603\times10^{-19}}

= 4.133\times10^{-15} \text{ m}

That's what I get, but the answer is given as 1.38x10^{-23}m.

By inserting this given answer into the equation, I get a value of 4.801x10^{-11} for p, which I can only get by the following:

300 \frac{\text{MeV}}{\text{c}} = 300 \cdot \left( \left( 1\times10^6 \right) \times \left(1.602\times10^{-19} \right) \right)

which ignores the c.

Is the given answer wrong, or am I missing something important?

This doesn't make any sense to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The unit MeV/c is actually a unit of momentum...no need to divide by the speed of light, it is already factored in through the use of this unit notation.

Generically, energy units consist of the quantities (mass)(length)2 / (time)2. If you were to divide energy by speed, you would be left with (mass)(length)/(time) which is a momentum unit.
 

1 MeV/c ≈ 5.344285×10-22 kg·m/s

So, 300 MeV/c ≈ 1.603×10-19 kg·m/s as you calculated.

 
Thanks for the replies. :smile:

Sorry. I'm still a bit confused.

To convert MeV/c to SI Units, do I just multiply the number (ie: 300) by "M" multiplied by "eV"?

I thought I was supposed to work it out as SammyS did, but doing that gives a different answer to the solutions.

EDIT

Galileo's Ghost said:
The unit MeV/c is actually a unit of momentum...no need to divide by the speed of light, it is already factored in through the use of this unit notation.

Generically, energy units consist of the quantities (mass)(length)2 / (time)2. If you were to divide energy by speed, you would be left with (mass)(length)/(time) which is a momentum unit.

Okay. MeV is a measurement of energy, units kgm^{2}s^{-2}. Dividing by speed (ms^{-1}) gives kgm^{-1}, which is momentum in SI units. So won't I need to divide my energy by speed, as you said?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top