Finding the Density Matrix of a 4x4 System at Thermal Equilibrium

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the density matrix of a 4x4 quantum system at thermal equilibrium, given a specific Hamiltonian matrix with defined elements dependent on a parameter c.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use the formula for the density matrix involving the exponential of the Hamiltonian and the partition function. They describe their approach of finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors to compute the matrix exponential. Questions arise regarding the correctness of their method and the input of matrices in the forum.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's attempts, providing feedback on their calculations and suggesting areas to reconsider. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of LaTeX for matrix representation, and there is an ongoing exploration of the discrepancies between the original poster's results and those found in their notes.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific values for k and T, as well as the need to clarify the input format for matrices in the forum. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the correct form of the density matrix and the calculations involved in reaching it.

yukawa
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How to obtain the density matrix of the following system at thermal equilibrium?

Given:

Hamiltonian H :(in 4x4 matrix form)
Hij = the i-th row and j-th column element of H
H11 = (1+c)/2
H22 = -(1+c)/2
H23 = 1-c
H32 = 1-c
H33 = -(1+c)/2
H44 = (1+c)/2
where c is a parameter and all other elements are zero
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi yukawa! :smile:

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
I tried to find it by using this formula:

[tex]\rho = \frac{e^{-\beta H}}{Z}[/tex]

where [tex]\beta = \frac{1}{kT}[/tex] and [tex]\ Z = tr (e^{-\beta H})[/tex]

I was stuck at finding [tex]\ e^{-\beta H}[/tex].

The following is what i tried in order to find [tex]\ e^{-\beta H}[/tex].

i) finding the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of H and write H in form of XDX-1 (where X is the matrix formed by the eigenvectors of H and D is a diagoanl matrix with elements equal to the eigenvalues of H) :

explicitly,
X11 = X44= 1
X22 = X23 = X33 = [tex]1/\sqrt{2}[/tex]
X32 = -[tex]1/\sqrt{2}[/tex]
all other elements are zero.
and
D11 = D44 = (1+c)/2
D22 = (-3+c)/2
D33 = (1-3c)/2
all other elements are zero.
(by the way, how can i input a matrix in the post?)

ii) then i calculate [tex]\ e^{-\beta H}[/tex] by:
[tex]\ e^{-\beta H} = X e^{-\beta D} X^{-1}[/tex] and [tex]\ e^{-\beta D}[/tex] is just taking the exponential of the digonal elements of [tex]-\beta D[/tex].

Is this approch correct? I can't get the answer as shown in my notes.
 
LaTeX

yukawa said:
(by the way, how can i input a matrix in the post?)

Is this approch correct? I can't get the answer as shown in my notes.

Hi yukawa! :smile:

I've just woken up … :zzz: not in functioning mode yet … :confused:

For the LaTeX for matrices tables and long equations, see http://www.physics.udel.edu/~dubois/lshort2e/node56.html#SECTION00850000000000000000

And if you know the answer, always tell us!

it makes it much quicker for us to spot where you've gone wrong. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the eigenvectors(left) and eigenvalues(right) of the Hamiltonian are:

[tex]\left|\uparrow\uparrow\right\rangle : (1+c)/2[/tex]

[tex]\left|\downarrow\downarrow\right\rangle : (1+c)/2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\left|\uparrow\downarrow\right\rangle - \left|\downarrow\uparrow\right\rangle ) : (-3+c)/2[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\left|\uparrow\downarrow\right\rangle + \left|\downarrow\uparrow\right\rangle ) : (1-3c)/2[/tex]

Write H = XDX-1,
[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \mathbf{H} =<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> \frac{1+c}{2} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{-3+c}{2} & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & \frac{1-3c}{2} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1+c}{2} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right) <br /> <br /> \end{displaymath}<br /> [/tex]

Therefore, take k = 1,
[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \mathbf{e^{-\beta H}} =<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> e^{-\frac{1+c}{2T}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & e^{-\frac{-3+c}{2T}} & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & e^{-\frac{1-3c}{2T} }& 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & e^{-\frac{1+c}{2T}} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right) =<br /> <br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> e^{-\frac{1+c}{2T}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{2}(e^{-\frac{-3+c}{2T}}+e^{-\frac{1-3c}{2T}}) & \frac{1}{2}(-e^{-\frac{-3+c}{2T}}+e^{-\frac{1-3c}{2T}}) & 0 \\<br /> 0 & \frac{1}{2}(e^{-\frac{-3+c}{2T}}+e^{-\frac{1-3c}{2T}}) & \frac{1}{2}(e^{-\frac{-3+c}{2T}}+e^{-\frac{1-3c}{2T}}) & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & e^{-\frac{1+c}{2T}} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> \end{displaymath}<br /> [/tex]

However, the ans. in the notes is:

[tex]\begin{displaymath}<br /> \mathbf{e^{-\beta H}} =<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> e^{-\frac{1+c}{T}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & cosh\frac{1-c}{T} & -sinh\frac{1-c}{T} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & -sinh\frac{1-c}{T} & cosh\frac{1-c}{T} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 & e^{-\frac{1+c}{T}} \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> \end{displaymath}<br /> [/tex]
 
Hi yukawa! :smile:

Best ever LaTeX! :biggrin:

Now I know the answer, it's easy to see where you've gone wrong …

you haven't!

you're just out by a factor of e-(1+c)/2T! :wink:
 
Last edited:
Oh! yes!
I got it.
Thank you very much.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K