Finding the derivative using the definition

  • Thread starter Punkyc7
  • Start date
  • #1
420
0
show that f(x)= x^(1/3) is not differentiable at zero.
I know there is a vertical tangent at the origin and therefor not differentiable, but I'm not sure how to say it in analysis.

I have tried using caratheodry but it doesn't seem to get me anywhere
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
22,129
3,297
Can you find the derivative of f in 0?? Perhaps by applying the definition of derivative:

[tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h}[/tex]

What is that derivative? Does it exist?
 
  • #3
420
0
No , I guess I should have said show show not differentiable using the definition.

Anyways

if I take the derivative I get

1/3 x^(-2/3)


if x goes to 0 is undefined... But how do you say that in math talk
 
  • #4
22,129
3,297
You just say that the derivative is undefined. If you calculate the limit from the definition, then you say that the limit does not exist (because...?). When you're arguing like in your last post, you just say that it is undefined in 0 as division by 0 is undefined.
 
  • #5
420
0
does it violate the Archimedian property? I'm not sure how to use the definition because how do you expand (x+h)^(1/3)-(x)^1/3. I cant use the binomial theorem to expand it out because that only works for whole numbers.
 
  • #6
22,129
3,297
does it violate the Archimedian property? I'm not sure how to use the definition because how do you expand (x+h)^(1/3)-(x)^1/3. I cant use the binomial theorem to expand it out because that only works for whole numbers.

Do note that you take the limit in 0, so you can take x=0. This simplifies a whole lot.
 

Related Threads on Finding the derivative using the definition

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
966
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Top