Finding the directions of eigenvectors symmetric eigenvalue problem

Click For Summary
In the symmetric eigenvalue problem, the eigenvectors are derived from the normalized form of the stiffness and mass matrices, represented as Kv=w^2*v. Each eigenvalue corresponds to an eigenspace that can have multiple dimensions, indicating that there is not a single eigenvector but rather a set of vectors. The discussion emphasizes that the negatives of eigenvectors are also valid eigenvectors. In complex vector spaces, normalized eigenvectors can be expressed with a complex phase factor, allowing for variations in their representation. Understanding these aspects is crucial for accurately determining the directions of eigenvectors in symmetric eigenvalue problems.
Andrew1235
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
In the symmetric eigenvalue problem, K~v=w2v where K~=M−1/2KM−1/2, where K and M are the stiffness and mass matrices respectively.
Relevant Equations
K~v=w2v where K~=M−1/2KM−1/2
In the symmetric eigenvalue problem, Kv=w^2*v where K~=M−1/2KM−1/2, where K and M are the stiffness and mass matrices respectively. The vectors v are the eigenvectors of the matrix K~ which are calculated as in the example below. How do you find the directions of the eigenvectors? The negatives of the eigenvectors of a matrix are also eigenvectors of the matrix.
 

Attachments

  • symmetric.png
    symmetric.png
    37 KB · Views: 149
Physics news on Phys.org
Andrew1235 said:
How do you find the directions of the eigenvectors? The negatives of the eigenvectors of a matrix are also eigenvectors of the matrix.
When we talk about eigenvectors, we are really taking about eigenspaces. Each eigenvalue has an eigenspace of one or more dimensions associated with it. No single vector is the eigenvector. In this case, you have a 1D eigenspace associated with each eigenvalue.

The author has chosen normalised ##v_1, v_2##, which limits the choice to ##\pm v_1, \pm v_2##.

In complex vector spaces, a normalised eigenvector is determined only up to a complex "phase factor" of unit modulus. E.g. a normalised eigenvector can take the form ##\alpha v##, where ##v## is a normalised eigenvector and ##\alpha## is any complex number of unit modulus. And, of course, real numbers of unit modulus reduces to ##\pm 1##.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K