Finding the energy lost in a collision as the bullet collides to the block

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 50 g bullet colliding with a 450 g wooden block at rest, which compresses a spring bumper upon impact. The discussion centers on calculating the initial speed of the bullet and the energy lost during the collision, considering factors like friction and spring energy.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore conservation of momentum and energy principles, questioning the initial speed of the bullet and the energy lost in the collision. Some participants calculate the final speed of the block and bullet system, while others raise concerns about the effects of friction on the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion has included multiple calculations and corrections regarding the speed of the block and bullet system, with participants addressing the impact of friction on energy loss. Some guidance has been provided on how to incorporate friction into the energy equations, and there is ongoing exploration of the relationships between kinetic energy and work done against friction.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the methods they can use. There is also a focus on representing energy loss in percentage terms, which some participants reconsider as unnecessary.

Lolagoeslala
Messages
217
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 50 g bullet hits and becomes embedded in a wooden block of as 450 g which is at rest on a surface (μ = 0.41) and is attached to a spring bumper. The block and bullet compress the spring bumper a distance of 20 cm. Is the spring constant is 250 N/m
find initial speed of bullet? how much energy has been lost in the collision?

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
mbvb +mwvw=mtvc
(0.05 kg)vb=(0.5kg)(4.47m/s)
vb=44.7m/s

b)
ET2= 1/2(0.5 kg)(4.47 m/s)^2
ET2= 4.995 J

ET1= 1/2(0.05 kg)(44.7m/s)^2
ET1= 49.95 J

ET1-W=ET2
W= 44.957 J

How would i represent this in a percentage?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you get 4.47m/s?
 
frogjg2003 said:
Where did you get 4.47m/s?

i calculated it...

1/2mvc^2=1/2kx^2
1/2(0.5kg)vc^2=1/2(250N/m)(0.2m)^2
0.25vc^2=5J
4.47m/s=vc^2
 
You forgot about friction.
 
frogjg2003 said:
You forgot about friction.

so umm...

1/2mvc^2 - Wf =1/2kx^2
1/2(0.5kg)vc^2 - (0.5kgx9.8m/s^2x0.41)=1/2(250N/m)(0.2m)^2
0.25vc^2 - (2.009J) =5J
5.29m/s=vc

IS THIS CORRECT??
but the speed has increased?
 
That's the force of friction, you need to multiply by the distance traveled.
Yes, the speed has increased. Your original calculation only accounted for the energy in the spring, and not the energy lost to friction. More energy means a higher speed.
 
frogjg2003 said:
That's the force of friction, you need to multiply by the distance traveled.
Yes, the speed has increased. Your original calculation only accounted for the energy in the spring, and not the energy lost to friction. More energy means a higher speed.

1/2mvc^2 - Wf =1/2kx^2
1/2(0.5kg)vc^2 - (0.5kgx9.8m/s^2x0.41x0.2m)=1/2(250N/m)(0.2m)^2
0.25vc^2 - (0.4018J) =5J
4.648m/s=vc

This is the right answer right?
 
Yes.
Now, what is the momentum of the block and bullet together?
 
frogjg2003 said:
Yes.
Now, what is the momentum of the block and bullet together?

i think you are trying to ask what is the final momentum well

mtvc
= (0.5kg)(4.648m/s)
=2.324 kgm/s

now when finding the speed of the bullet i am assuming you do this
mbvb +mwvw=mtvc
(0.05 kg)vb=(0.5kg)(4.648m/s)
vb= 46.48 m/s
 
  • #10
Right, and now you can determine the energy of the bullet before it stuck the block.
 
  • #11
frogjg2003 said:
Right, and now you can determine the energy of the bullet before it stuck the block.

so would you just do this??

ET2= 1/2(0.5 kg)(4.648 m/s)^2
ET2= 5.400976 kgm/s

ET1= 1/2(0.05 kg)(46.48m/s)^2
ET1= 54.00976 kgm/s

ET1-W=ET2
W= 48.608784 kgm/s

is this right??
hwow ould i represent this in percentage?
 
  • #12
Yes, that's right, but why would you need to represent it as a percentage?
 
  • #13
frogjg2003 said:
Yes, that's right, but why would you need to represent it as a percentage?

Oh wait i don't need to represent it as a percentage..
so this is right OMG! this is?? THANK YOU!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K