Finding the fermi energy in doped quantum well

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Fermi energy in a doped quantum well with a doping density of 1019 cm-3. Participants emphasize using the density of states in two dimensions (D2D(E)) and the relationship between electron concentration (Ne) and donor concentration (ND). The challenge arises from reconciling calculations at absolute zero temperature (0 K) with the behavior of the Fermi-Dirac distribution, leading to confusion about the implications of T approaching zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum well structures and band theory
  • Familiarity with Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Knowledge of density of states in two dimensions (D2D(E))
  • Basic principles of semiconductor doping and carrier concentrations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Fermi energy in semiconductor physics
  • Learn about the implications of absolute zero temperature on electron states
  • Explore the mathematical treatment of the density of states in quantum wells
  • Investigate the effects of varying doping concentrations on Fermi energy
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in condensed matter physics, semiconductor physics, and materials science, particularly those working with quantum wells and doping mechanisms.

nkk2008
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Regular Doping: Let's say that we want to introduce some electrons into a quantum well, by
adding dopant atoms (donors) to the semiconductor. The "regular" way to do this would be to
deposit our semiconductor films, first a "barrier" layer with large band gap, then the quantum
well with small band gap, and then another barrier layer, and during the deposition of the
quantum well we simultaneously deposit some low concentration of dopant atoms. The situation
for the conduction band edge as a function of distance through the structure would then look like

where E1 is the energy of the bottom of the lowest quantum well band and EC is the energy
difference between the conduction band minima in the barrier and the quantum well.

Consider a doping density of 1019 cm-3 in the well. For simplicity we'll assume zero binding
energy for the electrons on the donors, so that that all of these electrons are introduced into
propagating states of the quantum well. Compute the position of the Fermi-energy (at zero
temperature) relative to E1. (Hint: use the density of states in 2D).

PDZweoe.png

Homework Equations


Relevant equations are given below in the first few lines of the solution.

The Attempt at a Solution



\begin{align*}<br /> &amp; D_{2D}(E) = \frac{mL^2}{\hbar^2 \pi}\\<br /> &amp; N_h + N_D^+ = N_e + N_A^- \to N_D^+ = N_e\\<br /> &amp; N_D = 10^{19} \; cm^{-3}\\<br /> &amp; N_D^+ = \frac{N_D}{1+2e^{(-E_D + E_F)/k_b T}}\\<br /> &amp; N_e = \int_{0}^\infty D_{2D}(E)f(E)\;\mathrm{d}E =\int_{0}^\infty \frac{mL^2}{\hbar^2 \pi}\frac{1}{1+e^{(E-E_F)/k_bT}}\;\mathrm{d}E\\<br /> &amp; \text{very low T}\to \frac{1}{1+e^{(E-E_F)/k_bT}} \approx e^{-(E-E_F)/k_bT}\\<br /> &amp; \frac{N_D}{1+2e^{(-E_D + E_F)/k_b T}} =\int_{0}^\infty \frac{mL^2}{\hbar^2 \pi}e^{-(E-E_F)/k_bT}\;\mathrm{d}E\\<br /> &amp; \frac{N_D}{1+2e^{(-E_D + E_F)/k_b T}} = \frac{mL^2}{\hbar^2 \pi} \int_{0}^\infty e^{-E/k_bT}e^{E_F/k_bT} \mathrm{d}E = \frac{mL^2}{\hbar^2 \pi} e^{E_F/k_bT} \int_{0}^\infty e^{-E/k_bT}\mathrm{d}E\\<br /> &amp; \text{letting $u=E/k_bT$,} \int_{0}^\infty e^{-E/k_bT}\mathrm{d}E \to k_bT \int_{0}^\infty e^{-u}\mathrm{d}u = k_bT (1) = k_bT\\<br /> &amp; \text{Therefore, we have } \frac{N_D}{1+2e^{(-E_D + E_F)/k_b T}} = \frac{mL^2}{\hbar^2 \pi} e^{E_F/k_bT} k_bT\\<br /> &amp; \text{Rearranging, we get: } \frac{N_D \hbar^2 \pi}{mL^2k_bT} = e^{2E_F/kt} + e^{E_F/kt}\\<br /> &amp; \text{Solving the fraction term, we get:} \frac{N_D \hbar^2 \pi}{mL^2k_bT} = <br /> \end{align*}

So I have no idea where to go from here. The question says zero temperature, and I cannot reconcile that with the fact that if I have 0K as T, my equations make no sense.

Thanks
Nkk
 

Attachments

  • PDZweoe.png
    PDZweoe.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 886
Physics news on Phys.org
$$\text{very low T}\to \frac{1}{1+e^{(E-E_F)/k_bT}} \approx e^{-(E-E_F)/k_bT}\\ $$
Why don't you use the limit T=0 here?
$$\frac{1}{1+e^{(E-E_F)/k_bT}} \to
\begin{cases}
\dots &\mbox{if E>E_F} \\
\dots &\mbox{if E=E_F} \\
\dots &\mbox{if E<E_F}
\end{cases} $$

I'm not sure what the result will be, but it will certainly make calculations easier.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K