Finding the Force of air resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed and average acceleration of a 1967 Corvette with a 427 cu-in engine rated at 435 hp after 6 seconds of acceleration. Initially, the user struggled with various approaches to find the force of air resistance and kinetic energy but faced challenges in arriving at the correct answers. After several attempts and calculations, the correct speed attained was confirmed to be approximately 120 mph, with an average acceleration of 0.91g. The user expressed relief upon finally understanding the solution, realizing the problem was simpler than initially thought. This highlights the importance of methodical problem-solving in physics.
scytherz
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A 1967 Corvette has a weight of 3020 lbs. The 427 cu-in engine was rated at 435 hp at 5400 rpm. a) If the engine used all 435 hp at 100% efficiency during acceleration, what speed would the car attain after 6 seconds? b) What is the average acceleration? (in “g”s).

ans...
a) 120 mph b) 0.91g.



If someone knew how to approach this problem, kindly tell to me... Since I've tried different approaches, (Finding the Force of air resistance, rolling friction, Fuel consumption, substituting the energy used by the gasoline as the kinetic energy, .. But still didnt found the answer,... its almost 1 and half a week, trying to solve this problem,... and I think my approach is going way off...

Relevant Equations:

P = W/t
K=1/2mv^2
1 hp = 746 W = 550 ft lb/s
1 L = 3.5x10^7


The attempt at solution

since the car uses 427 in^3 engine(6.997 L), since 1L of using gasoline is 3.5x10^7, so the energy used is 244 895 000 j divide by 6 s, is 40 815 833.33j/s subtracted by the 435/6 hp, ans 40761 748.33 j/s... using the formula for Kinetic energy, K= 1/2mv2, I got 243 m/s... which is wrong...


I also tried using P = W/t , by finding the work, w= pt, w= 1 947 060 Nm, then substitute on k= mv^2, but still wrong...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


At a power of 435 hp, how much energy is produced in 6 seconds?
 


thats 2610 Hp or 1 947 060 Nm and substitute to energy... I ve tried that, and still got the wrong answer, my hunch is that we should utilize the given ( the 427 cu in engine) but tried it an still got the wrong answer... btw the answer on that one is 54 mph...
 


If you can show your full calculation, I might be able to spot what went wrong.

BTW, I am getting 53 m/s or 119 mph.
 


Redbelly98 said:
If you can show your full calculation, I might be able to spot what went wrong.

BTW, I am getting 53 m/s or 119 mph.


yeah I got it! Thank you very much!... I didn't know It was that easy, I wasted a week trying to solve this tricky problem...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top