ZenchiT
- 35
- 1
Guys! I think I've got the answer, I'm just going to upload it now. PLEASE BE RIGHT! 

The problem involves a projectile experiencing air resistance that is proportional to its speed. The context includes determining the constant of proportionality using terminal velocity and formulating the equation of motion for a projectile thrown vertically upwards.
The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have attempted to clarify their understanding of the forces and their signs, while others are still grappling with the dimensional consistency of their equations. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to reconsider the signs and units in their equations.
Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on understanding the physics concepts rather than simply arriving at a solution.

For the value of k, as I mentioned, if you are going to put numbers representing dimensioned quantities in the answer then you also need units. You don't need units for m and g since symbolic variables encapsulate the physical quantity independently of units. So you just need the right units for the 1/19.6 factor. What would those be?ZenchiT said:Part a) F=mg and F=kv
Therefore mg=kv and v=19.6 (terminal velocity)
k = mg/v
k = mg/19.6
Part b)
Equation of motion -> -mg-kv = ma
(Sub in k =mg/v)
-2mg = ma
a = -2g
dv/dt = -2g
v = -2gt
Or maybe instead of subbing in k=mg/v It should have been mg/19.6?
Voila! Surely that's correct right?!
Would it have N as the units because it has the same dimensions as force?haruspex said:For the value of k, as I mentioned, if you are going to put numbers representing dimensioned quantities in the answer then you also need units. You don't need units for m and g since symbolic variables encapsulate the physical quantity independently of units. So you just need the right units for the 1/19.6 factor. What would those be?
For part b), you have used the same symbol v for two different velocities, the terminal velocity and the initial velocity. So, yes, you should have substituted mg/19.6 (with units) for k.
The problem is the lack of units for the 19.6. What units should that have? So what units will the 1/19.6 have?ZenchiT said:Would it have N as the units because it has the same dimensions as force?
m/s^-1 as its terminal velocity?haruspex said:The problem is the lack of units for the 19.6. What units should that have? So what units will the 1/19.6 have?
m/s, or ms-1 (but not m/s-1) is right for the 19.6. So what should it be for 1/19.6?ZenchiT said:m/s^-1 as its terminal velocity?
Thank you for the amount of help you've given me!
Well, surely that is incorrect! (sorry to rain on your parade). The initial velocity is given as +6 m/s and your formula says initial velocity = 0!ZenchiT said:Part a) F=mg and F=kv
Therefore mg=kv and v=19.6 (terminal velocity)
k = mg/v
k = mg/19.6
Part b)
Equation of motion -> -mg-kv = ma
(Sub in k =mg/v)
-2mg = ma
a = -2g
dv/dt = -2g
v = -2gt
Or maybe instead of subbing in k=mg/v It should have been mg/19.6?
Voila! Surely that's correct right?!