Finding the Fundamental Solutions of a Third Order ODE

  • Thread starter Thread starter Temp0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental Ode
Temp0
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the fundamental solution to ty''' - y'' = 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I'm missing something really obvious, but I have the characteristic polynomial:
[itex]t\lambda^3 - \lambda^2 = 0[/itex]
Solving the equation:
[itex]\lambda^2 (t\lambda - 1) = 0[/itex]
I get zero repeated twice, so two of the fundamental solutions are 1 and t.
The third solution is [itex]\frac {1}{t}[/itex] to solve the equation, but substituting it in, I get the fundamental solution as e.
However, the right solution is [itex]t^3[/itex].
Did I miss something? Thank you in advance.
 
on Phys.org
It is not a constant-coefficient linear de, with solutions in form ##e^{\lambda t}##, with ##\lambda## a constant. Lambda can not be 1/t.

You can replace y"=u, a new function and solve for u(t). Then integral twice.

ehild
 
Temp0 said:

Homework Statement


Find the fundamental solution to ty''' - y'' = 0

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I'm missing something really obvious, but I have the characteristic polynomial:
[itex]t\lambda^3 - \lambda^2 = 0[/itex]
Solving the equation:
[itex]\lambda^2 (t\lambda - 1) = 0[/itex]
I get zero repeated twice, so two of the fundamental solutions are 1 and t.
The third solution is [itex]\frac {1}{t}[/itex] to solve the equation, but substituting it in, I get the fundamental solution as e.
However, the right solution is [itex]t^3[/itex].
Did I miss something? Thank you in advance.

Yes. The characteristic polynomial method only works for ODEs with constant coefficients. t is not a constant here.
 
Thanks for all your help! So I ended up solving the first order linear, and getting u(t) = t, which means y'' = t. Taking the integral twice, I'm getting:

y = [itex]\frac {t^3}{6} + C_1 t + C_2[/itex]

I kind of understand what's happening now, so [itex]\frac {1}{6}[/itex] is my [itex]C_3[/itex]?
 
Temp0 said:
Thanks for all your help! So I ended up solving the first order linear, and getting u(t) = t, which means y'' = t. Taking the integral twice, I'm getting:

y = [itex]\frac {t^3}{6} + C_1 t + C_2[/itex]

I kind of understand what's happening now, so [itex]\frac {1}{6}[/itex] is my [itex]C_3[/itex]?

You didn't show your work so It's hard to tell, but I think you are missing a constant in your work to get ##u(t)=t##.

There is another way to solve the problem that you might find interesting. Multiply your equation through by ##t^2## then look for a solution in the form ##y=t^n## for unknown ##n## and see what ##n##'s work.
 
Temp0 said:
y = t36+C1t+C2 \frac {t^3}{6} + C_1 t + C_2

I kind of understand what's happening now, so 16 \frac {1}{6} is my C3 C_3 ?

No. The original equation is a linear equation, so if f(t) is a solution, so is Cf(t). Your [itex]C_3[/itex] is just [itex]C_3[/itex].
 
willem2 said:
No. The original equation is a linear equation, so if f(t) is a solution, so is Cf(t). Your [itex]C_3[/itex] is just [itex]C_3[/itex].

If you mean what I think you mean, you are wrong. His ##t^3/6## should be ##C_3t^3##.
 
Temp0 said:
Thanks for all your help! So I ended up solving the first order linear, and getting u(t) = t,
which means y'' = t.

The integration constant is missing here. U(t)=C t.

Temp0 said:
Taking the integral twice, I'm getting:

[itex]y = \frac {t^3}{6} + C_1 t + C_2[/itex]

It would be [itex]y = C\frac {t^3}{6} + C_1 t + C_2[/itex]

Temp0 said:
I kind of understand what's happening now, so [itex]\frac {1}{6}[/itex] is my [itex]C_3[/itex]?
You can take C3=C/6, and then the general solution is y=C1t+C2+C3t3.
Each term of the sum is a solution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K