Finding the induced EMF on a bar - Faraday¡s law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the induced electromotive force (EMF) on a conducting bar moving in a magnetic field, applying Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction. The derived expression for the induced EMF is given by ε = -∫∫(dB/dt) ds + ∮(v × B) dl, where the first term accounts for the time-varying magnetic field B2 and the second term accounts for the motion of the bar in the uniform magnetic field B1. The participants conclude that the EMF induced in the circuit formed by points P1, P2, P3, and P4 is zero due to the absence of magnetic flux variation. Furthermore, if the bar were non-conducting, no EMF would be generated within the bar itself, although the potential difference remains unchanged.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields and their interactions with conductors
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration and differentiation
  • Basic principles of electromagnetism, including the Lorentz force
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Faraday's law in different electromagnetic systems
  • Learn about the behavior of non-conducting materials in magnetic fields
  • Explore the concept of magnetic flux and its calculation in various geometries
  • Investigate the implications of induced EMF in electrical circuits and devices
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and their applications in real-world scenarios.

chrishans
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A conducting bar of length L moves with velocity v, in a rectangular region with a uniform and stationary magnetic field B_1. Near the bar, there is a cylindrical region of radius R with another magnetic field B_2 (it may vary on time). Both magentic field are normal to the plane of the picture, and point inwards.
x6c27d.png

a)Find the expression of the induce EMF on the bar, indicating its polarity, and the potential difference between the top and botton of the bar.
b)Is it equal to the EMF induced in the circuit P1,P2,P3,P4?
c)What if the bar was non-conducting?

Homework Equations



Faraday's law: \varepsilon=-\frac{d}{dt} \iint_{S(C)}\vec B \vec{ds}=-\iint_{S(C)}\frac{d \vec B}{dt} \vec{ds}+\oint_C \vec v \times \vec B \vec {dl}

The Attempt at a Solution


a)Integrating over the red curve C and the surface enclosed by it, I get:
\varepsilon=-\iint_{S(C)}\frac{d \vec B}{dt} \vec{ds}+\oint_C \vec v \times \vec B \vec {dl}=\frac{dB_2}{dt}\pi R^2+vB_1L
I took positive EMF anti-clockwise, I may have messed up with the signs anyway.

Is this correct? I'm confused, shouldn't the EMF be the same whichever curve I take? (Note that if I take a curve such that it doesn't include the cylinder, the first term of the expression dissapears) My question is, how do I know which curve to take? It should be one which has all the points of the bar, but there are lots of them.

b)I would say definitely not, since there is no magnetic flux variation on that surface so EMF=0.

c)If the bar was non-conducting charges wouldn't move inside the bar, and so there would be no EMF there, but the potential difference would be the same?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried further and now I seem to have found the EMF's induced by both the cylindrical region (because of its time-depending B) and the square one (because of the bar motion), not taking into account the other one. Assuming both results are right, how do I get the final solution, the 'total' EMF?

Taking only the cylindrical region and integrating over the blue curve:
jg1wd5.png

\phi=-\frac{B(t)\theta(t)R^2}{2}
where \theta=2\arctan{\frac{L}{2x(t)}}
then
\varepsilon=\oint \vec E \vec{dl}=- \frac{d\phi}{dt} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{dB}{dt} \frac{d\theta}{dt}R^2, and this is the EMF's produced by the B2 of the cylinder. Due to the symmetry, E is only tangential to the cylinder/circle.
The other EMF is the classic vBl

So if what I did is right, is the total EMF the sum of the other two?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K