Finding the Inverse Fourier Transform of e^-5w*sinc(2w)?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Fourier transform of the function f(w) = e^(-i5w) * sinc(2w). Participants are exploring the methods to evaluate the integral associated with this transform.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up the integral based on the definition of sinc and express uncertainty about solving it. There is mention of using contour integration as a potential method. Some participants suggest using properties of Fourier transforms, such as the shifting property and the relationship between f(t) and f(at).

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing different approaches and properties that could be relevant to solving the problem. While some guidance has been offered regarding properties of Fourier transforms, there is no explicit consensus on a single method or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the Fourier transform, particularly in relation to the sinc function and its scaling properties. There is an underlying assumption that familiarity with Fourier transform properties is required to proceed.

Luongo
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
1. find the inverse Fourier transform of f(w)=e-i5wsinc(2w)



2. I set up the integral to be from defn of sinc: 1/2pi*integral from -infinity to infinity (sin(2w)/2w)*e^-5w



3. i have no idea how to solve this integral, is there a better way to do this?
i know that rect(t) has a F.T. of sinc(w/2) but how do i go the other way if it's 2w, not w/2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way that one normally does this sort of thing it to use countour integration.
 
Luongo said:
1. find the inverse Fourier transform of f(w)=e-i5wsinc(2w)



2. I set up the integral to be from defn of sinc: 1/2pi*integral from -infinity to infinity (sin(2w)/2w)*e^-5w



3. i have no idea how to solve this integral, is there a better way to do this?
i know that rect(t) has a F.T. of sinc(w/2) but how do i go the other way if it's 2w, not w/2?

Yes, there is a better way to do it. Use the shifting property of FT. If we denote the transform of f(t) by F(ω), one of the shifting properties gives:

[tex]f(t-t_0) \leftrightarrow e^{-i\omega t_0}F(\omega)[/tex]
 
There's also property that relates the Fourier transforms of f(t) and f(at). (I'll leave it to you to look it up in your textbook.) You should be able to solve the problem using that property along with the shifting property LCKurtz mentioned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K