Finding the Inverse of a Diagonal Matrix in Terms of Eigenvalues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the inverse of a diagonal matrix D in terms of its eigenvalues λi, specifically for a diagonalized N × N matrix H represented as H = UDU†. The inverse D^−1 is established as a diagonal matrix with entries (1/λ1, 1/λ2, ..., 1/λn), assuming all eigenvalues are non-zero. The relationship H^−1 = UD^−1U† is confirmed, emphasizing that the inverse exists only if none of the diagonal entries are zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diagonal matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of matrix diagonalization techniques
  • Basic concepts of unitary matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of diagonal matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about matrix diagonalization and its applications
  • Explore the implications of eigenvalues in matrix inversion
  • Investigate unitary transformations and their significance in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in linear algebra, particularly those working with matrix theory and eigenvalue problems.

P-Jay1
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Diagonalizing an N × N matrix H involves writing it as H = UDU† where D is a
diagonal matrix, with diagonal elements equal to the eigenvalues of the matrix H, and U
is a unitary matrix.
We may write:

D=
(λ1 0 0 ... 0)
(0 λ2 0 ... 0)
(0 0 λ3... 0)
(... ... ... ... λn)

Assuming all the eigenvalues are non-zero, how do I find an expression for the inverse matrix
D^−1 in terms of λi?
And how do I prove rove that H^−1 = UD^−1U†?


For the first question I'm assuming the inverse of D is just:

D=
(1/λ1 0 0 ... 0)
(0 1/λ2 0...0)
(0 0 1/λ3...0)
(... ... ... ...1/λn)

How do I find in terms of λi?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to "assume" the inverse of a diagonal matrix is the diagonal matrix having the reciprocal of each entry on the diagonal. Simply multiply the matrices and see what you get.

Of course, the inverse exists if and only if none of the diagonal entries is 0. And what you have already is precisely what is meant by "find an expression for the inverse matrix
D^{−1} in terms of λ_i".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Ivy. How do I go about doing the second question?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K