Finding the inverse of matrices larger than 2x2

  • Thread starter Thread starter dwn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the inverse of a 3x3 matrix without computing the first column. The matrix provided is [[-25, -9, -27], [536, 185, 537], [154, 52, 143]]. A brute force method is suggested, involving the assumption that the inverse has nine variables, leading to a linear system represented by AA-1 = I. The solution involves creating a 9x10 augmented matrix to derive the entries of the inverse matrix.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically matrix inverses.
  • Familiarity with augmented matrices and their role in solving linear systems.
  • Knowledge of the identity matrix and its properties.
  • Basic skills in manipulating matrices and performing row operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of finding matrix inverses using Gaussian elimination.
  • Learn about the properties of the identity matrix and its applications in linear algebra.
  • Explore the concept of augmented matrices in greater detail, particularly in solving systems of equations.
  • Investigate alternative methods for finding inverses of larger matrices, such as using determinants and cofactors.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching matrix theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix operations and inverses.

dwn
Messages
165
Reaction score
2
Is there a way without using the algorithm to find A-1 of a square matrix greater than 2x2?

The question we are given in the books is:

[-25 -9 -27]
[536 185 537]
[154 52 143]

We are asked to find A-1 of the second and third column without computing the first column.

(Sorry about the format...I couldn't figure out how to use the brackets on this one.)

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A brute force way to do it would be to assume the inverse has 9 variables as its entries and solve the linear system AA^{-1} = I You will get a 3by3 matrix equation which gives you 9 (hopefully independent) equations which you can solve using a 9 by 10 augmented matrix. The solutions will be the entries of the inverse matrix.

BiP
 
We just started the course 2 weeks ago and I'm trying to organize all the theorems we've learned thus far. But it looks like we've only learned to use the algorithm for A-1 -- reducing the matrix [A I] for matrices larger than 2x2.

I arrived at the answer by [A I3]

[-25 -9 -27 1 0 0]
[546 185 537 0 1 0]
[154 52 143 0 0 1]

and removing the first column of the identity matrix since they only asked for the second and third column.

Do you have any advice on learning and memorizing all the theorems in LA? I mean is that the best method to grasp LA?

Thanks!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K