Finding the Lim inf and sup of f(x)=1/(1+(ln x)^2) for Infinity and Beyond

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the supremum and infimum of the function f(x) = 1/(1+(ln x)^2) as x approaches both positive and negative infinity. Participants are exploring the behavior of the function and its limits in relation to its range.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limits of the function as x approaches infinity and negative infinity, questioning the relationship between these limits and the supremum and infimum of the function's range. There is also a focus on the implications of the function's domain.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the infimum being 0 and the supremum being 1, while others have pointed out potential errors in reasoning and clarified the function's domain. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and corrections without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing consideration of the function's domain, specifically that ln(x) is not defined for x ≤ 0, which affects the analysis of the limits and bounds.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
i need to find the sup and the inf of

[itex] f(x)=1/(1+(ln x)^2 )<br /> [/itex]

i can find the limit for the function for + infinity
and - infinity

but what to do next?
the sup is the least upper bound
the limit for +infinity is not SUP
??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you mean sup and inf of the range of that function. You seem to be thinking that the limit as x goes to infinity SHOULD be the sup and there is no reason for that. As x goes to either infinity or negative infinity f(x) goes to 0. Since f is never negative, 0 is the inf (greatest lower bound) of the range of f. Since the denominator is always larger than or equal to the numerator, f is never larger than 1- but f(1)= 1 so sup (least upper bound) of the range of f is 1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks
 
Halls, I think you have a typo here:
HallsofIvy said:
...but f(0)= 1 so sup (least upper bound) of the range of f is 1.

because of the [tex]\ln x[/tex] term, [tex]f(0)[/tex] is undefined. I believe you meant to
type

[tex] f(1) = 1[/tex]
 
Thanks statdad. I have edited so I can pretend I never made that mistake!
 
Nothing to see here. Move along. :smile:
 
HallsofIvy said:
As x goes to either infinity or negative infinity f(x) goes to 0.

...ln(x) is not defined for x<=0.
The domain of f(x) is {x:x>0}.
Cheers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K