Finding the Limit of f(x) Near x=2

  • Thread starter Thread starter garyng2001hk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the limit of a function f(x) as x approaches 2, specifically lim(x --> 2) f(x). The context includes a given limit involving the expression (f(x)-5)/(x-2) equating to 3.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of substituting values into the limit expression and question the reasoning behind certain steps. There is an exploration of why the numerator must equal zero when the denominator approaches zero, and clarification on the correct interpretation of limits and function values.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants seeking to clarify their understanding of the limit process. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of precise language in mathematical expressions and the relationship between limits and function values.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the informal steps leading to the conclusion that the limit of f(x) as x approaches 2 is 5, but the formal reasoning and steps remain unclear among participants.

garyng2001hk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find lim(x --> 2) f(x)


Homework Equations



Given lim(x-->2) ((f(x)-5)/x-2)) = 3
Find lim(x --> 2) f(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 5. but i dun know the formal steps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garyng2001hk said:
The answer is 5. but i dun know the formal steps.
How do you know the answer is 5? What are the informal steps?
 
If i subs x=2 into the denominator, the denominator goes to 0.
therefore, the numerator should equals 0 and x=5
 
I think you have the right idea...

Let's start with the first part:
If i subs x=2 into the denominator, the denominator goes to 0.
This is fine. But just so I can be sure you know what's going on -- why is it that you can evaluate [itex]\lim_{x \to 2} x-2[/itex] by substituting x with 2 in (x-2)?


therefore, the numerator should equals 0
Can you say why?

(This is the most important question in my entire post. If you answer only one, make it this one. But you should answer all of them)


and x=5
That's wrong. Did you mean f(x)=5? That's wrong too. Did you mean f(x) goes to 5? Then that would be right.

It may seem like I'm nitpicking here -- but the ability to write what you actually mean is incredibly important in mathematics.

If nothing else, once you can write what you mean, then any arithmetic needed to do a calculation usually becomes a lot more evident.

Anyways, can you argue why
[tex]\lim_{x \to 2} \left( f(x) - 5\right) = 0[/tex]​
implies
[tex]\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) = 5[/tex]​
?

I'm assuming you've had a few homework problems that ask you to do problems exactly like this -- so hopefully this argument has become second nature. If not, you should practice until it is second nature. :wink: I'll give a hint: you pretty much have only one theorem that relates limits and subtraction, so you should use it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K