Finding the linear density of charge on a cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the linear density of charge on a cylinder with a linear density of 2λ, surrounding a rod with a linear density of λ, using Gauss's law. Participants express confusion regarding the problem's wording and the implications of "long" versus "short" geometries. The consensus suggests that the linear density on the cylinder's surfaces is 2λ, and there is a possibility of treating the problem symmetrically about the rod. Additionally, participants explore the feasibility of converting linear density to surface density to apply Gauss's law effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law and its applications
  • Familiarity with linear charge density concepts
  • Knowledge of cylindrical symmetry in electrostatics
  • Basic calculus for surface integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in cylindrical coordinates
  • Research the relationship between linear charge density and surface charge density
  • Explore examples of electrostatics problems involving symmetry
  • Learn about the implications of charge distribution in electrostatic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to charge distributions and electric fields.

davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


A rod with charge linear density λ is located at the long axis of a cylinder with charge linear density 2λ. With this information use Gauss's law to find (a) the charge linear density on the interior and exterior surfaces of the cylinder (b) the electric field outside of the cylinder at a distance r from the rod.

Just to make sure: my questionnaire does refer to charge linear density, not surface density. My questionnaire does not make reference to a "long" rod nor a "long" cylinder. I've read these calculations are next to impossible if there's no reference to "longness".

Homework Equations



Θ=q/ε

q=λL -- for the rod

The Attempt at a Solution



This question does not make any sense to me. So I'm not going to try to answer it, because I'm in disagreement with the question. I hope you also consider the question is wrong or weird or prove me wrong so I can understand.

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a way to convert linear density to surface density?
 
Hmmm... I have also had similar issues with poorly worded problems. In order to make sense I would have to assume that by linear charge density on the cylinder, they meant for you to take it as 2pi R dL with L being the length of (presumably) the rod and cylinder both. The charge density would then be linear with respect to L. I'm not entirely sure though. Not answering a problem, however, normally doesn't work out too well.

If you look at the charge density this way, you should be able to treat it as linear due to symmetry about the rod for all points on the cylinder.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I was thinking that if I take the wording as it is, then the linear density on the surface (interior and exterior) is just 2λ based on what their statement was.

As far as part (b) goes, I was thinking if there is some way to convert linear density to surface density so that I can then use gauss's law to calculate the charge contained within some gaussian surface at 'r' distance from that system.

Any ideas if this is at all possible? (converting linear density to surface density).

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I'm not really sure how I feel about that honestly, I've seen it done in reverse (unjustifiably in my opinion). It can be done in certain circumstances, and this might be one of them. After sleeping on it and reading it again, it does seem like what they mean by linear charge density is that the density doesn't vary with r or theta, only L or z or whatever you want to call your cylindrical axis. That being the case, you shouldn't necessarily need to convert it, because your surface integral from gauss' law will merely be a function of L and constants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K